New York (AFP) – FIFA has banned fans from bringing refillable water bottles into World Cup venues in a last-minute policy change that will force thirsty supporters to pay for bottled water, The Athletic reported on Wednesday.
As recently as last month, FIFA’s official stadium code of conduct included a clause which read: “For the avoidance of doubt, empty, transparent, reusable plastic bottles, up to (1 liter in) capacity, may be brought into the Stadium.”
However The Athletic reported on Wednesday that those guidelines had now been tweaked to explicitly ban refillable bottles.
“For the avoidance of doubt, reusable water bottles may not be brought into the stadium,” an updated stadium code of conduct read.
In a statement to AFP, a FIFA spokesperson said the rule change was taken on safety grounds, noting that several World Cup venues already barred the use of refillable water bottles.
“FIFA is committed to protecting the health and safety of all players, referees, fans, volunteers, and staff,” the statement read.
"FIFA made the decision to prohibit bottles to prevent risk and injury to players and attendees.
“Outside bottles are already prohibited at several of these venues for safety considerations, and FIFA is applying this consideration across its tournament stadiums.”
The statement added that misting stations, fans, hydration stations and cooling tents would be available in “the stadium footprint”.
It added that bottled water inside the venue would be sold at prices which “remain consistent with other events held at each stadium.”
The rule change comes despite experts warning fans could face health risks from extreme heat at open-air venues during the World Cup, which is being co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.
A report published by the World Weather Attribution research group last month estimated that 26 of 104 games at the World Cup are likely to be played in conditions where the Wet Bulb Global Temperature (WBGT) exceeds 26 degrees.
WBGT is a measure of heat stress on the human body which combines temperature, humidity, wind and sunlight.
At last year’s FIFA Club World Cup in the United States, where fans complained of searing temperatures, supporters were also barred from bringing water bottles into venues.
You could have gone one further and discuss whether toothpaste is actually a liquid or not. It’s a paste, or more specifically a Bingham plastic.
But that probably would go way above their mental capabilities if they already don’t understand what resealable means.
Airport security doesn’t follow definitions of physics, they follow their list of rules.
And in those rules, toothpaste is a liquid.
I looked it up, and no in their rules toothpaste is not a liquid. But pastes, gels, creams and aerosols aren’t allowed either. So yes the toothpaste argument wouldn’t hold.
But the resealable bag argument still stands. They also only need to fit in it, not have to be in it (the bag is only to facilitate screening, not a requirement). So if it was just toothpaste the whole bag wasn’t necessary to begin with.
Good one, and I may use that if I wasn’t in a rush hour queue with people wanting to be on their way.
Sometime I wish I had the time and money to push trivial things like these to a court hearing.
On the other I hate how some very rich people do stuff like that not out of principe but just sue to save a couple of bucks.
Or you could go on with your day instead of being a prick to the minimum wage dude who definitely didn’t write the law just trying to get through the week 🤷♂️
A minimum wage worker who loves to power trip? They made an issue of the bag not being resealable while it’s in fact resealable. They don’t write the law but they love to (wrongly) up keep it.
Definitely a power trip and just not some person who can’t give a fuck what the manager wants this week and getting into another fight over a stupid policy they don’t actually give a fuck about. And the TSA management definitely doesn’t change the rules each week.
Go right at them and make em miserable. They wanted to ruin your day with the bag. And you definitely know what’s going on in their life to make them give a fuck about your bag, and it’s to cause you rage.
I just don’t subscribe to the defeatism of a job is a job, and no matter how terrible of a practice it is or how badly they do it, it’s justified because I was told to.
If you can’t accept people giving you shit for doing a bad job, don’t do the job. Or accept it that you won’t be liked for it. There are also plenty of good TSA agents, that would just have waved you through, because you know, you did what was required.