- cross-posted to:
- fuckcars@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fuckcars@lemmy.world
Why would any work towards making their tech better when you can just free yourself from the consequences of its mistakes.
Why would any work towards making their tech better when you can just free yourself from the consequences of its mistakes.
I do not necessarily disagree, I think they should be taxed to all hell and resources used to improve infrastructure. I am just saying if an uber driver runs a red light, may not be anything Uber can do about it
Taxi companies found a way. Just because a tech monopoly wants to say they’re different doesn’t actually mean they are. They can use that money to properly screen and train drivers and only once a best effort has been made (which again taxi companies have shown can be done) do they get lessened liability.
But agreed 100% on the tax them into the ground and build public infrastructure instead idea. Loads of people love trolleys and trains, never see anyone get excited about an Uber or a Lyft
Right but taxi companies did it the same way mcdonad’s did. Franchises…
Franchising changes how expansion is financed. It doesn’t magically change liability or operational requirements and is not relevant
Yes it does, mcdonald’s is not liable for a slip and fall at a franchise location.
Maybe but the franchise location still suffers the risk of getting shut down because the corporation doesn’t want to deal with the lawsuits. Or did you think that safety requirements where not in the Franchise agreements?
That’s factually incorrect. Look up Vicarious Liability suits which are are exactly that. A lawsuit where an injured party believes the franchisor is at least partially responsible due to various things which can include negligence in safety standards imposed on the franchisee. As with all law it gets complicated fast but there are definitely ways to hold McDonald’s accountable for things at a franchise location. They aren’t magically free.
What state? I am a lawyer in Texas
You’re either a liar or a lawyer I’d never fucking hire that’s for sure.
Here’s literally my first search result I find a lawyer talking about it in Texas
And here’s another five seconds to find it mentioned in a supreme court case
And five more seconds where it’s mentioned in Texas in a previous case
You clearly did not read your nonsense
Companies create the incentive structures, checks, and balances that drive their employees to take certain actions. Factories that don’t leave enough time for workers to do their due diligence cause workers to ignore safety checks. Hospitals that pay surgeons to work overtime cause surgeons to make mistakes from inattention. Rideshare companies that pay drivers depending on how quickly they get people from point A to point B cause drivers to disobey traffic laws.
At the very least, legal responsibility for crashes and traffic law breaking is an incentive for rideshare companies to change their drivers’ incentive structure in order to promote save driving. It doesn’t have to be a moral assignment of guilt, just a way for society to have fewer road deaths because of market forces.
Uber could provide training and if there are drivers being reckless of their own accord face a risk of getting banned (fired of you will) from being a driver.