• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      The new CDC guidelines highlight methodologically flawed studies from Africa that have no relevance to the United States. They chose to ignore studies that were conducted in the United States and show no link between circumcision and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV (Thomas et al., 2004).

      Media literacy necessitates consideration of opposing viewpoints from reputable sources. Not all “experts” agree with the CDC. Source.

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Of course they don’t. Still, the CDC is very reputable and I trust them over it. It’s also ridiculous to say the CDC is misinformation.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I didn’t say the CDC is misinformation, just that other scientists have shown the flaws in their methodology. Science. I have a healthy uncircumcised son. I would have circumcised him at birth if the science warranted it. It does not. If parents circumcise for religious reasons that’s their choice. But it must be recognized that the science used to validate this religious belief is weak.