• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Why not a co-op instead? Owned by members rather than a corporation/shareholders.

    On the other hand, if government subsidisation works well for medication (with the PBS) and university (with CSP places), maybe it’d work well for other necessities like food too.

      • Nath@aussie.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Owned by individual isn’t the same thing. Whoever owns the IGA still has an interest in making a profit. A Co-op is like a club where the store is owned by club members. The idea is the store sells everything at/near cost price.

        Whether your co-op can buy cheaper than Colesworth retail prices is a different matter.

        The Government however can in theory buy products at enough scale to be at a comparable wholesale price to Colesworth - and if they start selling at/near wholesale cost price, it can put pressure on the duopoly to actually compete.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Whether your co-op can buy cheaper than Colesworth retail prices is a different matter.

          Some people are willing to pay a bit more if it means supporting a community store over a big corporate one.

          I’m living in the USA now, and there’s a lot more supermarkets here. In my area in California, there’s a few local chains with 3-4 stores, some co-ops, and the major stores. The biggest supermarket (Walmart/Sam’s Club) only has 20% market share, and even the top 5 companies (Walmart, Kroger, Costco, Albertsons and Ahold Delhaize) still only account for 44% market share. The top 3 in Australia (Coles, Woolworths, and Aldi) account for around 75% market share.