• TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The last rebuttal with hard facts and links just made you spew a word salad of gaslighting while ignoring anything you were offered. I don’t have any hope for you, I’m just annotating for other readers caught up in the theater.

      • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sorry reading is hard for you

        You said people claim, “both sides are the same”

        I said, “Your stupid argument that both parties are not the same is not something people make. If you go to a party and you want a drink, and you can only have coke or a bottle of dasani water, you are drinking a coke product. You do not get a choice eve. Though they are different.”

        You said, “I was talking about climate change” and then quoted your own false claim about people both sides-ing the argument

        Are you malfunctioning?

            • Pratai@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You don’t even deserve a compelling argument. That this other person is willing to slum, doesn’t mean you earned yourself a discussion. I laugh at fools, I don’t give them my time.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Also, horrible example, coke is not water, yet you both-sides it because “it is a coke product”. Plenty of differences, a lot of them directly affecting people’s health. Or perhaps as apt as you obliviousness of how bad of a gaslight it is.

          Just say what you mean, “it is a coke product” is a metaphor for “it is influenced by American lobbyists” so you imply people should both-sides it and apply no nuance.

          • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Hey congrats, we are almost through my first comment.

            Now here is the rest that you keep ignoring

            "We are at a point where we are literally running against cyberpedophile Nazis that are doing warcrimes, and establishing concentration camps and your “opposition party” is running on “restoring ACA tax credits”

            Since Im just a dumb American who doesn’t understand anything, can you please explain to me why the democratic party STRUGGLES to beat what I mentioned above?

            Why is their current platform not to “hold immediate trials for treason and warcrimes”, “dismantling concentration camps and locations missing migrants” " delivering free healthcare and education like 85% of Americans want" “taxing billionaires and corporations into submission”, “stopping support for the most hated country and leader in the world, Israel and Netanyahu”

            Please explain"

            • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              What a garbage spew of accusations. This thread is about climate change, and it’s clearly you want to derail with a lot of baggage, which ironically enough, one side is still considerably worse than the other for each and every issue you try to shotgun with. I doubt you are American, and I doubt the why of each needs to be explained in anything other than an theathered echo-chamber.

              You are both-siding this and appealing to perfection as a solution, both common appeals used in manipulation, just like the majority of this theater is doing.

              Again, and again, and again, and again, and again …