He’s billing himself as an advocate for queer rights. Well it’s not Lesbian Rights, Gay Rights, Bisexual Rights, Trans Rights, Queer Rights, etc., it’s LGBTQ+ Rights.
For LGBTQ+ voters, the clearest takeaway is that Talarico’s record is broadly supportive of LGBTQ+ equality, especially compared with the anti-LGBTQ+ politics surrounding the Texas GOP.
Because if you had bothered to open that article you would’ve noticed they cite examples of why they come to that conclusion. You on the other hand have offered nothing except a single video (forgot to add, from the same authoritative site) you deliberately interpret in a way that suits your opinion. If nothing else you’ve proven you’re clearly biased, they haven’t.
So I’ve read all that, and all I can see is a man who has changed and abandoned us.
“Trans people deserve dignity and equality, those are certainly principles and values that I still hold, and that stem directly from my faith.”
Insulting us, and banning us from sports is exactly what he claimed to be against.
When someone tells you who they are, you listen. Maybe he had a stroke, maybe he believes he can win if he sacrifices us, either way I cannot support it.
He’s billing himself as an advocate for queer rights. Well it’s not Lesbian Rights, Gay Rights, Bisexual Rights, Trans Rights, Queer Rights, etc., it’s LGBTQ+ Rights.
Is James Talarico an LGBTQ+ ally? Here’s what Texas voters should know
An ally wouldn’t throw trans people under the bus.
I wonder who I believe more? A pro-LGBTQ site stating he’s an ally or some rando who acts like a bad actor claiming he’s not.
I think I’ll stick to you’re full of shit and I don’t believe what you’ve said.
Cute fallacy. Haven’t seen Appeal to Authority from a leftist space in a little while
Leftist??
Another play from the bad actor playbook. Keep going, continue proving you’re a bad actor.
Then tell me why a news outlet appealing to a demographic is more authoritative than a literal, actual person from the demographic.
Because if you had bothered to open that article you would’ve noticed they cite examples of why they come to that conclusion. You on the other hand have offered nothing except a single video (forgot to add, from the same authoritative site) you deliberately interpret in a way that suits your opinion. If nothing else you’ve proven you’re clearly biased, they haven’t.
So I’ve read all that, and all I can see is a man who has changed and abandoned us.
Insulting us, and banning us from sports is exactly what he claimed to be against.
When someone tells you who they are, you listen. Maybe he had a stroke, maybe he believes he can win if he sacrifices us, either way I cannot support it.