I think that he is right about decentralization of the servers(if it’d be possible to keep the phone numbers) and the desktop app issue

But I think the phone number requirement is a good thing because people can just find each other without having having to exchange usernames and stuff.

Signals aim is privacy, not anonymity. If you want anonymity, there are better options like Simple X.

  • AxisExperience9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    He makes valid points, I don’t think anyone ever claimed signal to be the best way to message privately. What it DOES do is make private messaging easily accessible for normies.

    Not that I disagree with the video though, requiring a phone number etc are not beneficial to privacy and caters to normies, maybe too much.

    At least soon they’ll release the feature to sign up without a number. Just took a while to get there.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t they require you to make a payment from a credit card for the numberless feature?

      • nebby@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        They require you to have google play services installed and to pay through google play. There is no reason for this other than to collect data.

    • Luc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doesn’t simplex already have a different meaning in communication systems?