As far as I see that instance is a far-right cess pool. Everything I’ve got from that instance were low-quality transphobic “news articles”.

    • Kantiberl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While it’s crucial to oppose harmful ideologies like Nazism, we must be wary of how we define such harmful groups. If we broaden these definitions arbitrarily, we risk encapsulating people who merely differ politically, diluting the term’s significance and unjustifiably alienating individuals. In doing so, we inadvertently shrink our own communities, polarizing society to the extent where a moderate viewpoint might be mistaken for extremism. Right-leaning communities fall into this trap as well, resulting in fragmented realities where each group exists in its own echo chamber. This division deepens societal fissures and undermines moderate views, which, in my belief, are grounded in reality and thus instrumental in achieving balanced discourse.

      • artisanrox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Soooooo here’s a helpful hint to tamp down that utter confusion you seem to be having:

        The guys who want armed guard genital inspectors in front of every bathroom are the bad guys.

        • Kantiberl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who exactly holds the authority to label ‘the bad guys’? Sure, some actions are undeniably harmful, but does that warrant placing all perceived wrongdoers in the same category, from internet trolls to murderers? Is there no nuance or room for varying degrees of transgressions? I hope you can ask yourself if you’re always on the side of righteousness, or might you be perceived as 'the bad guy" from another perspective? It’s important to understand that the world is not simply binary, and such a mindset can dangerously oversimplify complex issues.