The other bullshit is, “news” channels have to abide by rules and regulations against bias and misinformation. Every time Fox News gets sued for something like that, they say, “We’re not “news” we’re “entertainment media”, no reasonable person would take anything we say as fact” to avoid being regulated or held accountable. This was their entire defense in the Tucker Carlson v Dominion Voting case

If you haven’t been the reason they had to change the rules are you even really living?

That depends on what you mean by “using furniture”. The mechanics have always worked, so I’m assuming your asking, “have animations been added when using furniture?”

You sit down in chairs or on the side of beds when you sit to rest, but you still don’t climb in/out of beds when sleeping or sit longways like some mods allow.

Of all the stuff that’s been added and is still missing, I don’t really care if they ignore minor cosmetic stuff like this for a while. Towing needed to happen, but it’s still implemented poorly. Sports cars tow better than pickup trucks for some reason and nothing can tow faster than about 35 mph. I’d much rather that be fixed than focusing on “would be nice” stuff like animations for minor actions.

Talk show host and vodka enthusiast

Neckussy

Oh, I know why…

There’s not much to see in the red areas. All the tourist spots everyone wants to visit while on vacation are outside them.

If you’ve ever called someone an idiot or moron, that’s just as wrong (arguably more wrong) as calling someone a retard. Look up the “euphemism treadmill”.

All of these terms were used to describe the same people and fell out of favor when people started using them as pejorative terms.

She looks evil enough to skin a toddler alive because she needs a dinner napkin

Entropy. The second law of thermodynamics. Things naturally change from a more-ordered state into a less-ordered state.

Energy is required to reverse this process. All the processes you describe are putting things into a more-ordered state and thus, require energy in some form.

Imma thank god for sending me the blessing I’ve been praying for and pick that shit up

I don’t get this sub. Someone made this exact same shitpost but with Jordan Peterson. That post is sitting at around 20 downvotes because people don’t like Jordan Peterson. This post is at about 40 upvotes because people like Trevor Moore. They’re both excellent shitposts, and are basically the same post, but because one person is subjectively more liked, that post is voted higher.

Anyway, he’s a comedian who died because he got too drunk and fell off his balcony so it’s illegal to say anything bad about him.

I don’t get it. We can all agree that fuccbois and PUAs are gross, but we’re all celebrating this person’s recent posts?

If this were a white guy bragging about how easy it is to bang Korean MILFs, y’all would not be in here with the same type of comments.

it’s violets, we don’t really need to speculate!

Indeed. She’s been very upfront about the fact that she’s seeking validation and amusement in the form of attention from men who are sexually repressed by their culture and has no intentions of returning any of the attention she receives from them unless it benefits her. Many Korean hearts will be broken this summer.

But hey, at least we get to upvote the memes about it and cheer for “girl power” right?

The people hated him because he showed them the truth.

Makes sense. Pretending to be something you’re not is helpful when seeking an asymmetrical relationship with an unbalanced power dynamic in your favor.

When I was young, the assumption was that no information could be trusted. We were taught that everything you read was written by a person with an agenda; who that person is and what their agenda might be needs to be accounted for when parsing any message.

“I’m not racist. I just can’t stand all these fucking foreigners.”

That’s what you sound like.

ITT: Gatekeeping readers.

Everyone claiming reading is superior because of some vague sense of it communicating the information “better” or because of your own subjective experiences sound just like all those people who thought the printing press would be a disaster because people would waste all their time reading instead of listening to people. Same energy, different time period.

If both people come away with the same understanding, what difference does it make? You can’t tell whether they read or listened unless you ask them. There’s nothing you can ask about the book that will give any indication one way or the other.

[citation needed]

If two people are standing in front of me, one read the book, the other listened to it, if both of those people know what happened in the book and can discuss it with comprehension, I’d be unable to tell which one read and which one listened. So, does it really matter? Seems like a distinction without a difference to me.