• 0 Posts
  • 927 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • Yes, I do disagree. As I pointed out this is the result of working for a shitty corporation.

    Are all newspapers firing all artists? No, not at all.

    There are great reasons not to like AI. Violations to copyright and bad business practices using at as an excuse to lay off staff are not the reasons. It is a red hearing.

    I don’t know what you think of capitalism. You could let me know if you like.









  • Oh please, if that was the truth then AI proves it wouldn’t happen. After all they have pretty much violated the copyright of every artist on earth without so much as a slap on the wrist.

    I get it, you don’t like AI. I don’t like how we are using these Large Language Models speculations to create a boom/bust economic cycle. This isn’t even the worst of it as it is also being used by authoritarian governments to target people. To top it off it is just a general buzz word businesses are using to rip off consumers.

    There are a lot more negative things as well. What OP is upset about though is a problem with business in general. If you are going to hate on AI at least hate it for real reasons.







  • Mate, I already explained it is not stealing. When I said I think you are wrong about the definition of stealing I was being generous.

    The definition of stealing is literally depriving someone else of property. This does not happen in copyright cases which are a civil matter rather than criminal matter.

    The OP is also wrong for the reasons I already pointed out. Those being that the reason they are losing their job is not because of AI but because they work for a shitty capitalist corporation.

    As I alluded if his job would have been replaced by a foreigner who was paid far less he would also not be okay with it and his comic would likely look very racist.

    This is because the problem is not AI in this situation. Do you have an opinion on this?




  • I think you are wrong.

    Stealing requires depriving someone of their property.

    If my daughter draws a character from Totoro she has done nothing wrong. She has not stolen anything. If my daughter draws a new character in the style of Totoro she has also not stolen anything.

    What you are talking about is copyright infringement.

    Let me ask you this. If OP was replaced by an artist from India who works for 1/10 the price would this all be suddenly okay?

    No, it would not be. The problem this person is complaining about is not about AI. It is a much bigger problem that both of you fail to recognize.


  • Art is iterative so the concept that you need permission to use a style is ridiculous. Certainly Studio Ghibli did not invent that art style.

    As I was saying “stealing” is bullshit because you are not depriving the originator of anything. What you are talking about is copyright infringement.

    Personally I detest the whole concept of imaginary property. So your not going to convince me AI is bad because of it.