For the plane, it had to evacuate the stinker it had in its belly.

It’s really not that big of a deal. They also have no ignition/start button, which is the only sane way of have it in a EV. You just get in and drive.

If you look into the recent model years, they are above average in terms of build quality. Reliability looks also pretty good according to to statistics. Even the most basic driving assistance enhances safety for anyone, and Tesla FSD, as idiotic as the name is, is very good and definitely safer than the average human at the wheel (who must anyway always monitor the situation and take over if needed, so it’s a summation of systems). If you compare price-to-features, no-one is close to Tesla right now. That’s the reason why they sell a huge amount of cars. And I hate it, but it’s true.

It’s such a shame that honestly pretty awesome cars with leading driving assistance software are constantly miss-advertised and ruined by the man in charge. So absurd.

Right now the driver has the duty of supervising constantly the system, so in no case is Tesla to blame (legally)

Didn’t know that! Interesting

Additionally, Americans are typically fat and need even more radial maneuvering room. That’s why they find European cars cramped. The comments on cupholders in American car forums are very funny.

Well no cameras nor sensors in there though. Antennas? I would only expect cables for tilt adjustments and heating.

As already written, 100% agreed on this

What struck me is the generalization implied by that sentence: that any woman having a free choice would choose against having children. I still think the sentence has this literal meaning and see a problem with it. Maybe the commenter didn’t mean it that way? I don’t know, but I’m not doubling down I think, I just try to explain myself :)

I read it and I didn’t like the meaning, my aim was not just be pedantic.

What? Lol

What I meant is that the commenter and people thinking that women having a choice directly choose not to have children are acting entitled and it’s shit. So the opposite of what is being read out of my comment. Probably I wrote it just badly 😆

You might be right :)

Agreed! But your sentence has a very different meaning from the one I addressed

Exactly, but how the sentence is written implies that any woman with a choice, would choose to avoid children. I see it as discriminatory, as there are many women who freely choose to have many children.

The commenter writes that any woman would always have less children if given a choice: I don’t agree, as there are also women who want to have many children and it’s also ok. I’m all in for autonomy.

The second one is entitled shit.

EDIT: evidently my comment is nowhere near clear enough: what I mean is that thinking that any woman having the choice, automatically chooses not to get children, is entitled shit.

I accept your correction ✌🏻

Dumb governments for dumb peoples. Social media and smartphone addiction created this. But Trump is surely not stupid, he just shamelessly hoards what he can (mainly illegally I suppose - but laws won’t bring him down) from bamboozled citizens.

To clarify: dumb peoples is meant for the each and every population in the world…