People are bad at media literacy?

How can you be betrayed by someone with no loyalty?

I don’t think this guy has done the math for if every man needs more than one woman to survive…

I feel like I’m getting better at analyzing sentence structure from all this

Wait, look at the placement of the road markings, especially the yellow line. Wtf

The language/sentence structure and account name are also very suspicious. I want it to be real so bad though

X. Y. Z. Every single time.

Sir you better see this, my slopometer is picking up a reading

Edit: Definitely slop, check out the yellow line and other road markings. Even a solid-white-divided two-lane one-way road, the best “reasonable” match, would only have a single yellow line.

It’s good enough to make the point, but inaccuracies add up, so I always try to correct the ones I percieve, however small.

I disagree, because your suggestion is treating a symptom. The cause-- the structures and incentives causing the divide in the first place-- would remain, and you will never resolve all the symptoms until the cause is resolved. Trying to resolve every symptom first would result in a neverending battle.

Thanks for the advice

They should try running chatgpt in their brain when it’s not online

Human pattern recognition could use a few updates

lemmy shitpost never fails to amaze me with how concentrated its ragebait is

This better be satire or I’m showing 1% of my power and taking my upvote back

So are we supposed to like psychically detect instances of roofieing and Instant Transmission into the middle of shady bars to punch out evil men or what?

And? Women still have to worry about this.

Delusionposting contender 2026

We can only ever work on one issue at once

The problem is that people keep saying “Not all men” in direct response to women expressing that they don’t feel safe. Same energy as telling a black person “All lives matter”.

I don’t think this is entirely accurate. The equivalent of an “all lives matter” person is a “men have issues too” person, not a “not all men” person. The first two are from people taking issue with advocacy for one group (black people; women) because they see it as exclusionary of or harmful to their group (white people; men)*. In contrast, “not all men” people are responding to a percieved attack directed at them, not just to being excluded from targeted advocacy. Subtly but meaningfully different, imo.

* Technically non-black people and non-women, I suppose? But this is the general pattern I’ve recognized.