It is also chromium based, so stands to get the same nerf.

While I’m completely disinterested in football, and I do think the craze is often more than a bit much, this is just overly reductionist. Does everything one cares about and finds fun/interesting necessarily need to have intrinsic value? I’d say no.

“taiwan says is”

alternate caption:
“has feet”

*spiderman

sigh, i should remember to read usernames…
See you never.

…no?

oh that is clever!

I hate my logitech k400, it’s feels like a sheet of paper blocks the signal.

I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.

Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.

Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.

someone didn’t read the article ;p

That’s a normal distribution. The average is right in the middle, at the peak. Being in the “top 65%” means 35% of people have a lower score.

couldn’t be clearer.

on the bright side, even if this were a really good test, 94 is probably within margin of error from true average.

I hear he was a pretty good speaker 🫣

the locks are quite basic though, literally pickable with a hair pin

One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons

does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

I dunno, all you need to see that something is going on is 100m or so of elevation with an overview of a medium sized lake