

I never hid the fact that I’m a woke DEI socialist.
I never hid the fact that I’m a woke DEI socialist.
I assume they’re fucking? But I’m not sure.
Fascism never wins permanently.
Jesus Christ the corruption is so blatant now. They used to have to pretend it wasn’t happening at least.
Thanks, I will check it out.
Lots of reasons people can be at peace and still hate one another. Look around the world there are tons of examples. I’m not saying we’re best buds, just not actively killing each other. Hell, the existence of another nearby hostile power is a classic way this happens, which perfectly matches the hypothetical.
I personally think the idea of an instantaneous global revolution is totally ridiculous so I don’t find this answer very compelling. Even if global anarchy is achieved which is not a certain thing, there will be a period of transition, and some regions will transition faster than others.
This is the objectively correct way to eat kiwis whether society is ready or not.
This has been one of the anarchic ideas I have questions about.
Let’s say we have a burgeoning anarchic society. We’ve solved issues with intracommunity violence, production, and distribution. We’ve managed to negotiate peace with neighboring states so they aren’t a direct threat anymore. It’s the anarchist paradise we always wanted and things are going great.
However, one of these non-hostile states nearby gets involved in a war with another state. They end up losing and things get bad. Millions of refugees end up fleeing into the anarchist territory, far more than can easily be accommodated with existing systems. Furthermore, most of these people have been indoctrinated into thinking anarchists are violent, dangerous weirdos and don’t have any interest in our new society. They just want to keep doing their authoritarian capitalism but in a place that isn’t on fire.
I’m not saying borders are the best solution to this problem but it is clearly a problem that is possible or even likely to occur in the future. How would an anarchist society solve this issue? Isn’t there a danger that a wave of too many people with anti-anarchist ideology might risk the destruction of an anarchist society?
None of these things happened in congress. If there’s one thing we can still depend on it’s congressional inaction.
Federal officials can still be subject to state charges if they break state law. It’s not a matter of ordering a federal agency to do anything, so the supremacy clause should not be relevant here. The question is what state laws could they be breaking? There may not be any.
It absolutely could but yeah it’s not going to since US activists will likely be more focused in democratic threats for the time being.
This is actually an argument I can’t remember anyone making—that the numerous crimes and atrocities the Trump administration would execute in relation to other issues and communities would distract focus from Palestinian liberation and enable further ethnic cleansing. Maybe that would have been more convincing to Harris skeptics but I don’t know.
I can’t think of a time they did something this blatantly illegal in term one but it’s been a while so I may have forgotten.
You can post separate comments and ask people to upvote the one they agree with, though there’s no way to restrict how people vote up and down and the exact vote tallies will vary depending on your instance due to the way federation works.
If you want to have a very rigorous and well-controlled poll an external site may be the best solution, but for informal things the above may suffice.
Mainstream media is also saying that flagrantly ignoring court orders would be too extreme for Trump while his administration is engaged in this very action.
True but it at least requires them to go through that process and can still inconvenience and intimidate people. Trump is capricious and unpredictable and there may be uncertainty as to whether such pardons will be granted, and even if they are, people could be arrested in the meantime.
If there is a way to nail them with state charges then this would get around this although I would assume most of these activities primarily violate federal law and take place in the District which does not have the independence of a state, unfortunately.
Only applies to the presidency and only if the courts remain a legitimate institution in the US, a fact that is increasingly in question.
But also, his goons are completely vulnerable either way and there is little the president can do with his own hands.
I would advise you not to hate people you don’t know just because they fly a flag but your feelings are valid. Nationalism is a toxic ideology founded in violence and oppression at its very core.
No chance of passing thankfully.
Good point I should have mentioned that one.
Disgusting. Does he pay these people or what?