

The rule for psychopathic narcissists in 2026:
If they’re going to sue, you know it to be true.


The rule for psychopathic narcissists in 2026:
If they’re going to sue, you know it to be true.


werealltryingtofindtheguywhodidthis.jpg
The top left one especially because, in the full photo, they’re sitting on a statue of two parrots having sex.


“Data Analyst Finds that ‘Lazy Awful Game Stigma’ Can Reduce the Number of Reviews a Game Gets by 53% - And the Reviews it Does Get are More Negative”


Ah, thank you.


Three thoughts:


Sometimes I just like to curl up in my summes after a long winter.
I think that ship has left the dock, and already hit an iceberg. Reports are that Barron is a fan of Andrew Tate and was part of the reason he was released.


Pretty standard kabuki politics.
Tillis and Cassidy are retiring or lost their primary. The rest of the “rifts” are barely disagreements, from Ted Cruz and Nikki Haley - effectively “I’m so upset with Trump I’m not going to cup the balls for the next five minutes.”
For the rest, I’m sure they’re very upset behind closed doors, which is great for them because they can get all that aggression out before going on Fox News and telling the world it’s the best deal of the century and Trump is a master negotiator.


I agree with dunking on the deflection, but this is more a red herring logical fallacy, which is (as the image says) presenting an irrelevant (whether true or false) subject change to avoid rebutting the argument. It could also perhaps be framed as ad hominem or appeal to hypocrisy, though neither truly fit.
Not really a straw man fallacy, which involves presenting an intentionally weak version of a relevant core argument to easily rebut it.


The thought they have immediately before or after is also, “I’m the next Steve Jobs.” It’s always about the ego before any product or need.


Toddler’s drawing ass-object?


Pretty much what they did in China as well. Google, back when they had a backbone, decided to leave instead, and Apple was like, “How can we censor ourselves better for you?”


Poomp!
Billion. It’s a thousand times worse than $300 million.


Yup, exactly.


Apart from the injustice from this obvious fascist move, some observations:
Musk is the living embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and his wealth represents the exact monetary value delta of confident ignorance over intelligence.


Trump administration: It’s fine to not actually govern as long as we can make it appear so.
AI: It’s fine to not actually produce real work and intelligence as long as we can make it appear so.
Not exactly surprising they were made for each other.
I don’t get it, what’s suspicious about a skinny 34-year-old blonde wanting to spend all her time around an 80-year-old diaper-smelling man-child who has literally nothing valuable about his life or personality except his fleeting grasp of unearned power and money?