Your prudery and moralism bores the hell out of me https://randomrantdispenser.neocities.org/rant04-2024-07-18
- 2 Posts
- 14 Comments
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Are there countries/territories where copyright law is *truly* unenforced?English
18·1 day agoOther Brazilian here: Although they don’t care much about piracy at individual level, there were local servers seized and from time to time they take down some locally hosted sites, so although it’s safe for you to download and even p2p share stuff, you can get unlucky hosting - if it’s near elections and some politician needs to pretend he is having the police working.
R.I.P. Manicômio Share
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Has somebody looked up your license plate in Flock? Now you can find outEnglish
22·2 days agoFlock Safety operates in only one country.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Games@sh.itjust.works•72% of devs believe Steam has a monopoly on PC games, according to studyEnglish
512·4 days agolol the downvotes
“You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.”
You can buy a game license on Steam. Your only access to it is through them, you can only install and play it through their store. You need to have their program running to check your license and also probing your system to see what you are running and logging your activity. If the company so decides, they can remove your access to the game because you never bought it, they only gave you a license. This market model removes player’s autonomy and keep everything locked out of players control.
Or you can buy a game on GOG. After you buy the game you don’t need GOG for anything, you have full control of the installation file and can back it up however you want and install wherever you want. You can use their launcher if you want to log your activity for social features but that’s optional. You bought the game and have your copy, publisher and distributor can fuck off forever.
Yet, people believe not owning and controlling the games you paid for is “better”…
(not knowing how games used to be, and what online stores have taken from you, is a tragedy)Oh, the game is not available on GOG? That’s because the publisher doesn’t want consumers to have any control over the game, they want to control how, when and where you can play it, including revoking licenses if your own self-hosted private servers don’t follow the moderation rules the company wants, and if you still buy it you are just keeping this anti-consumer market model viable - just like consumers made lootboxes, pay-to-win, battle passes, single player games requiring online verification, and everything that enshitified gaming viable. Market share is no metric for service quality.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Games@sh.itjust.works•72% of devs believe Steam has a monopoly on PC games, according to studyEnglish
320·4 days agoThere are better things, just like modular phones are better than iPhones, but consumers are driven by propaganda and herd mentality and they don’t care the least if the product they are buying denies them autonomy. If consumers were smart, pay-to-win features and battle passes would have never become a thing.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Can i make offline dvd installers for pirated games?English
27·5 days agoFor torrented games, just don’t delete the installation files?
For GOG, burning your games on DVD is not even piracy. According to the EULA, you are legally allowed to keep one backup copy.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Can i make offline dvd installers for pirated games?English
55·5 days agoIt’s crazy, but people nowadays install games through online stores, and they pay to not own games :S
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Warning to new tutamail users, your account could be temporaryEnglish
1·6 days agoStored emails are encrypted in any service, the difference from Tuta, Proton, Atomic, etc, to Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and others, is that they don’t have the decryption key. But yeah, technically any of them could make a copy of unencrypted emails you receive and send (the later don’t even need to since they have the key), but they can’t do it retroactively. Proton had a few third party audits checking their services, but afaik Tuta hasn’t.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Warning to new tutamail users, your account could be temporaryEnglish
1·6 days agoYou are talking about End-to-End Encryption. Zero-Knowledge Encryption means they don’t have access to your mailbox because they don’t know the password, it’s not stored on their server, they only know the hash it generates (which is used to verify you know the password, but the password itself is never exposed).
Even though they can’t get inside your mailbox they know all the incoming and outgoing metadata (addresses of emails sent/received) so they know your traffic (there is no way to encrypt metadata anyway, it would be like giving a letter to a mailman but not telling him who to deliver it to), but, say, court orders them to give access to your mailbox, they have no way of doing it, only someone with your password can read your emails.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Warning to new tutamail users, your account could be temporaryEnglish
151·6 days agoThey can’t read your emails though, Tuta uses zero-knowledge encryption, it was something else that got you flagged. Did you send a lot of consecutive emails?
After 25 years, Mercosul and EU finally have a free commerce agreement. Lula have been meeting all EU leaders and trying to get it done, but I don’t think he would have done it without Trump fucking the EU relations with the USA.
PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Open Source@lemmy.ml•Is there a browser compatibility checker for websites?English
1·10 days agoHmm, I have a blink and a gecko browser on desktop and mobile, and open the site on both to check how it’s being displayed :S
I hear a lot of people complaining about sites breaking on Firefox, but I never experienced that, only on secure forks that removed canvas, webgl and webgpu.
I have a few static sites as well and I use JS. The only thing I noticed changing, that can push elements weirdly, is scroll bars, buttons, the default audio player… but you can edit those with css to look similar on both browsers.
Did France government really say anything or was just one cop in one newspaper saying they don’t like GrapheneOS because they can’t crack it?
That being said, Fediverse and GrapheneOS are hardly comparable, and no company anywhere will try to cover for you in an investigation, in any country if the police shows up with an order to check acc creation info and logged IPs the service will comply or will be responsible for whatever you are using it to do.



Or perhaps my ISP’s range of dynamic IPs improved its reputation recently?