I work from home since 2012, so almost 12 years. The small company where I work started allowing remote working with me, and then many colleagues followed. Now we are 100% remote with one day a week in office. All my workmates and I know very well that we are far more productive when at home compared to when we are in office. My commit history also confirm this. I will never take in consideration another developer position if not allowed at least 80% of remote working.

I come from VyOS and really liked it, but still prefer opnsense for the GUI, constant updates and plugins. VyOS started losing appeal once they opted for subscription stable iso access (even if they did give me a free subscription for some comment contribution in their repo). Also, I have to admit, that VyOS needs a fraction of the resources needed by opnsense.

Since last update, 2.13 I think, it does not work well with gog games, at least was not able to install flatout and pillars of eternity, both from my gog library. Nonetheless I was able to install pillars from the epic store, using heroic. With flatout I spent a week trying to debug installation problem, clear cache, reinstall of heroic, and everything else and then simply used lutris which installed flatout at first try and let me play right away (steam deck)

I tried virtualizing Windows on proxmox and it went smooth

Here it is the comment I was looking for. Another fellow three body problem reader, I suppose.

I would try this route first.

Here is my logic: it’s the effort to find what you are looking for in a bunch of files and I don’t know how many lines of source code versus the effort to search for some packets (which you should listen for anyway in the final solution) sent from a specific IP address over a relatively small amount of time.

I played it first when it was a free mod and then bought on steam and put on my backlog list because I really enjoyed what I saw back then.

Now, wouldn’t be amazing if someone develop, you know, HL3 or at least episode 3? The game script wasn’t published some time ago because of copyright expiration? I would pay for it, and I am sure I am not the only one.

I know Microsoft didn’t get this right with naming and you got caught in the trap but there are 2 (actually 3) ways of hosting Blazor.

I also see that this confusion won’t help OP choose Blazor over some more coherent dev environment hehehehe

You are talking about Blazor webassembly, I am talking about Blazor server side, which loads as fast as a “normal” website.

Server side Blazor has other caveats, that’s why I specified it is an intranet project, where server side Blazor fits very well. Anyway, at the moment, Microsoft is still putting effort in polishing both type of Blazor hosting model.

This is not our first Blazor intranet web app and some of them are running in production for one year more or less.

It is really a joy to program using Blazor, especially if you need cross tab/browsers/device/user real time communication, which comes almost free thanks to underlying SignalR channel.

My two cents: I strongly agree with this. We just deployed an intranet blazor server app running on Linux (don’t know which distro) and apache (we might switch to nginx soon). It works very well and we had to write less than 100 lines of JS (mostly for file download and upload) One of my workmates was hired one year ago and at the time he didn’t know anything about .Net stack. Now he is mostly autonomous and he loves .Net and blazor in particular. Obviously YMMV.

I don’t know from 1903 to 1980 but from 1890 to 1903 they did not fly at all. The first “modern” flight happened in December 1903.

Me also can’t stand the changed control panel UI. Most of the times I just hit WIN+R and type “control”

I am using windows 11 since the preview both for work (dev) and for gaming (although I switched to the steam deck as my main gaming platform) and don’t remember any breaking or blocking bugs. On the contrary, using bluetooth headset got a lot better and easier with win11. Which bugs did you spot?