They don’t know which account made which payment. They only know that a payment was made.

Can tell from a glance, it’s way too complicated and powerful to be a Keep alternative.

If you’ve the self awareness to know you’re making an informed choice badly, I can’t fault you.

It’s making a judgement.
One that’s limited to men.
Limited to wearing smart glasses.
Limited to being on a date.

When the real red flag of recording people without their consent at all, isn’t limited to any of those. And it’s not even mentioned in the title.

Conversing with you about the implications in the title of the article. Sorry for your confusion.

Was confused. You cleared up the ambiguity nicely now. Thank you.

I’m not confused. It’s a very simple statement, that couldn’t be more clear.

It absolutely is. No denying that. As truthful for men as it is for Malamuts.

No! Of course not, it’s obviously mostly men. Exclusively men I’d bet.

The only woman I’ve heard of even buying a pair was a reporter specifically doing it for a story about them.

But the title I quoted wasn’t literally the subtitle.
Then you said “It’s literally the subtitle” as if referring to what I quoted.
You can see the confusion now, right?

But men doing it more often isn’t the problem with Wired’s title. It’s that Wired’s title implies it’s only a problem when men do it. Or more specifically, only a problem when men do it with Meta’s glasses.

That’s a better title. It’s directly mentioning a specific thing. It’s not moralizing that thing, or implying anything about it.

It’s only sensationalizing when it’s the truth. If it’s not the truth it’s lying. And that a whole different thing.

“As anxieties over surveillance tech grow, unsuspecting singles are sharing stories of being covertly filmed on dates by Meta smart glasses.”

That’s literally the subtitle. And it would work just as well with better the title you wrote.

Seemed like the focus was on women catching them.

Does this one talk about Wired’s choice if title?

Still doesn’t mean anything to Wired’s title.

Malmoits? Those dogs are crazy smart and have far to much energy.

Sure. I have no problem with the article or larger public conversation. The title is sensationalized with sexism, and a fad device. Which is what I tried to spark this conversation about.