i think it’s still worth to ban the imports of these recording-glasses. if we need to help the visually-challenged, then make models that doesn’t have the recording function.
i think these recording-glasses are different from phone cameras because these glasses are way too discreet (you cant tell when you’re being recorded).
sad but probably is the truth of what happens :-(.
whatever name (‘multiculturalism’, ‘monoculturalism’, etc) by which it may be called, can we do all we can to ensure we dont need such a ‘guide document’ here in Aus, please 🙏 🙏 🙏 .
whatever name (‘multiculturalism’, ‘monoculturalism’, etc) by which it may be called, can we do all we can to ensure we dont need such a ‘guide document’ here in Aus, please 🙏 🙏 🙏 .
whatever name (‘multiculturalism’, ‘monoculturalism’, etc) by which it may be called, can we do all we can to ensure we dont need such a ‘guide document’ here in Aus, please 🙏 🙏 🙏 .
Good move! And only allow ones that doesnt have function to record (e.g. to help the visually-challenged).
a somewhat alternative view that i find amazing: https://reclaimthenet.org/the-meta-settlement-what-it-means-for-speech-and-privacy. seems Meta is ok with the big $23Billion settlement because it will give them more profit in the future.
ok to disagree with politicians, no one politicians can please everyone, but we are (or at least should be) better than calling for political violence. Have a blessed day.
reconsider such call for political violence.
please reconsider this and/ or get the help you need 🙏 .
i believe it’s quite an accepted pattern of human nature that what we dream/ fantasize/ aspire to do, we would want to do and carry it out in the real-world. hence these child-sex-dolls are dangerous for kids in the society.
i believe it’s quite an accepted pattern of human nature that what we dream/ fantasize/ aspire to do, we would want to do and carry it out in the real-world. hence these child-sex-dolls are dangerous for kids in the society.
the safety of children must be the first consideration.
spot on!
Hi there. Are we saying that adults who has sexual orientation towards children is “normal” or “born that way, they cant choose to be otherwise”?
Not every person who possesses or imports a child-like sex doll will go on to become sexually abusive. Current research does not establish a simple causal pathway.
In fact, some scholars found doll owners showed lower arousal to abuse scenarios and lower sexual aggression proclivity than those who didn’t own a doll.
Other studies similarly found doll use was linked to reduced deviant and compulsive sexual behaviour.
I’m finding the above misleading, because the ‘studies’ linked seems to be about ‘adult’ sxx toys, not child like sxx toys.
I believe it’s quite obvious that there is No positive outcome of those wanting/ owning/ using child like sxx toys. For the sake of the community, they belong behind bars!
the other issue (with Albo’s path) is that the under16s are smart enough to get around the age-verifications anyway… like this one: https://cybersecuritynews.com/fake-moustache-bypasses-age-verification-system/.
yes, you’re spot on
as owners of backyard chickens, those look tempting (on behalf of the chickens) hahahahaha :-).
well done!
gold! 👏