Valbrandur

You mean this bullet wound? Part of his helix is gone. You can see very well where did the bullet hit.

Adrenaline is one helluva drug.

I think Yogthos is not using “your guy” to talk about the perpetrator but about Trump. There is no way someone would try to stage a false flag by making someone shoot at a person’s ear with a sniper rifle at a distance of 150 m. As Yogthos implies, you have a bigger chance of killing your guy than actually succeeding.

Edit: Without an optic on his rifle, on top of all.

Or the Boeing whistleblowers who keep being unalived

Murdered. The word is murdered.

If your message is not getting censored, do not hold back in how you describe it.

In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

• Michael Parenti

I am completely sure that China is indeed spending god knows how many millions in building more solar farms in a year than the US has built in their entire history so people like Jake from Minnesota can be convinced that China is actually a pretty cool place.

Do you people ever listen to yourselves?

I cannot believe that I was born in the right time to see the incredibly rare and mythical Danish W.

China’s fault.

Two words: Swedish. Pharaohs. They built their pyramids using IKEA assembly instructions.

A.D.A.S. (All Dragons Are Swedish)

Sweden collecting and hoarding Ls like a medieval dragon

As so was his irrelevancy in the general landscape of Russian politics.

Exactly. In their eyes, the instant a person opposes liberal interests, anything and everything against them, including tools of systemic oppression such as homophobia, racism and sexism, is fair game, and that won’t make you a reactionary unless you use those only against “deserving” people.

A full 8 hours of an internet tough guy being racist, ableist and homophobic while insisting that they’re not any of those things because they feel like they aren’t those things, despite ample evidence to the contrary from their comments.

This phenomenon fascinates me. As far as I have managed to understand it, it is because while a marxist will identify the use of perjorative language that attempts to brand someone else as homosexual, disabled, etc. in order to denigrate them as inherently reactionary due to how it implies that all of those things are negative, a liberal will not consider such an act to be homophobic, ableist, sexist and so on as long as you do not maintain that behaviour with most people of said group. In their mind, being ok with most people of the LGBT community makes you not homophobic despite frequently using the word “c-cksucker” against men they don’t like, being ok with most women makes them not sexist despite calling women they don’t like “b-tches”, and so on.

Tankie who doesn’t know fuck-all about somebody tries to label them as something they are not and twist their words to make them out to be awful, instance no. 2985673.

“Nonono, you don’t get it: telling someone to go suck a dick is not homophobic if the person in question is an enemy of the white, enlightened and civilized west.”

You’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.

I can’t wait for Pootin to push too far and the sane part of the world can wipe you fuckers off the map.

I can’t wait for you to tell me how you are absotely not racist either.

Go suck Pootin’s tiny dick.

Lib discovers Lemmygrad and immediately starts using homophobic rhetoric, instance no. 127.

First Belgium, now Ireland. Who’s next? Vote now on your phones.

Russia shall either be a superpower or have Pizza Hut. It cannot have both. History shows to us that this is as an absolute truth.

Ad scandinavicum: point out your opponent’s Swedish/Norwegian/Danish nationality to immediately obliterate them.

Jokes aside: Scandinavians are overall nice fellas but damn it, they are also not only some of the people most pleased with bourgeois order that I know of, but also completely politically illiterate. Just search on Quora for people asking if Norway, Sweden or Denmark should keep their monarchies and look at their defenses to keep them around on the replies.

Russia is a fascist reactionary dictatorship

People will now resort to label any country that opposes the west as a dictatorship (and not in the marxist sense), even if it openly celebrates bourgeois elections every 6 years.

Inb4 “but they are rigged!!1!”

So are they everywhere else, either by limiting by design the choices (see: USA) or by limiting the powers that democracy grants to the people. You seem to be Swedish: you cannot even choose your own head of state.

Edit: my country constantly suffers from scandals every election in which governing parties shove thousands of fake votes by mail into the system and no one has ever called it a dictatorship simply because it is part of The West™.