Thanks, I seen this post a few times and then reality bites just hit me after my brain had ruminated a bit I guess.

Yea, and now there’s the swingback glorification of selling out.

Financial success in and of itself shouldn’t be shameful or exalted, I wonder if there’s a movie showcasing that exaltation of personal commercial success the way reality bites showcased the shame.

I can’t think of one that nailed it the same way.

Reality bites(1994) portrayed the paradox of the newfound “horror” of selling out in the 90s by achieving goals you set our for yourself.

That nailed a specific part of american culture for most working people in the country.

Waiting is also weirdly accurate because on the production side you need actors to focus on portraying a particular personality trait to define the entire character, but that applies in real life to restaurant dynamics, one salient personality trait sort of defines who each person is, like it makes it easier to work in a group if you know that that guy is the stoner or that guy is the cool dude or that girl is the bossy one.

Kids(1995) got suburban entropy pretty solidly. Gummo is kind of in that category too, although I can’t confirm because I never lived in the boonies.

Tuesday Fiasco

Haha, no.

I’m sorry you’re having such difficulty with reality, but civil rights and green technology is the future.

Must be difficult living in a progressive world leaving you behind.

I see and hear a more progressive population inundated with more conservative news.

Totally agree about voting.

I’m not, but that sounds like you. Why?

If I ever start looking for a cult, I’ll ask you first.

Your whole stance is based on vague pretense, spin and wholesale fabrication.

Make up your silly, false stories if you like, and prepare to get called out.

I don’t need to change maga minds, that’s longer trying to fill a bucket without a bottom.

I’m stating his very clear, dedicated investment in concrete legislation that is helping hundreds of millions of people.

“Ride dicks” if that’s your game, but leave me out of it.

Actual pogressives care about lgbtq+ rights, sustainable technology, investing in critical infrastructure, taxing billionaires and fixing the climate, all issues that the Biden administration has dedicated significant time and resources to.

You don’t know who or what you’re talking about.

There you go making things up again because you don’t have a leg to stand on.

Biden was a great first-term president, he’ll be a great second term president.

Keep fuming and playing make believe, it’s pretty funny.

By all means, go tattle on me for correcting your inaccuracies.

Nobody is pretending Biden is “fine”, I’m saying that he was supported for his positive progressive policies that benefited hundreds of millions of people for four years, and everyone is suddenly siding with maga trolls throwing a hissy fit because the old guy who did a great job as president is still old.

Any progressive listening to your limp maga crap is showing themself to be nearly as susceptible to playground taunts as you lot.

As I said, you are naking things up to serve your rapist traitor hero.

Thanks for agreeing.

I am, don’t sweat it.

Social media is blurring the lines here .

Please, it’s clear “elder abuse” is another limp maga slogan.

You vote for the rapist if you want, I’m voting for the good president who has achieved successful policies that benefit hundreds of millions.

He doesn’t support genocide, he’s actively against it.

The only people that believe that are idiots voting against him anyway.

Pulls are idiotic and do not predict anything useful.

You’re repeating bandwagon myths and making inaccurate assumptions.

That is absurd.

Biden led a good first term with many solid beneficial policies, let him lead a second good term.

You are high as a kite if you think replacing a known candidate with solid support 4 months before an election is a good election strategy.

It’s a terrible idea and puts the Democrats at a significant disadvantage showing political instability, poor decision making and confusing builders.

It’s a terrible idea to unnecessarily replace a good president.

Can’t see the point in betting against him here other than hopeful hipster cynicism being awarded with internet points.

What is the downside of supporting him?

We know he advances progressive policies that benefit hundreds of millions of people.

Voting him in keeps a sane person in the White House.

He’s already shown how active he is as president in his first term, regardless of his age.

I don’t see the downside of voting for someone who has already proven themselves to be a good president.