Windows isn’t / doesn’t use a microkernel
Windows isn’t / doesn’t use a microkernel
They are
Rosetta 2 was so good because M1 had hardware to help with x86 emulation. Presumably qualcomm can do the same thing.
The mainboard looks cluttered due to the verbose silkscreening, it doesn’t actually look that complex compared to the other mainboards.
CUPS eats printers and shits out function, it’s all open source so underlying isa doesn’t matter much.
A lot of software people use on desktop is proprietary and not source available. There is also no guarantee open source stuff is portable.
Not the first, teamspeak has had a spatial audio api for a long time
Seeing “European” is all you need to know this is rage bait
I would recommend ProtonVPN, Windscribe is kinda predatory in their pricing and I don’t appreciate it
Carbon capture makes much more sense directly on smokestacks and other industry waste outputs, but then how do businesses make taxpayers fund it?
Thruster? I ardly know er!
You think small bezels are headline topics?
The only quirky word in there is metasurface
Can’t wait till we get braincell PMICs
The middle bar is a perfectly adequate step all by itself
CAD is “Computer Aided Design”. if you want to talk about parametric modeling, then fucking say that because it’s really a lot more niche than you think.
KiCAD is an extremely competent suite of programs with full linux support, maybe get your head out of the dirt, lol.
My friends would never in a million years run an exe I gave them lol
It was a localization thing originally, and they just decided to bring the US in line with japan if I remember correctly
I don’t think that is what they mean by “which is a bit like MIPS or RISC-V.“