• 3 Posts
  • 176 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 20th, 2020

help-circle
  • I am not defending Telegram in any way by saying this, but how can you be so certain that content supposely encrypted with MTProto when using Cloud Chat is only stored in plaintext on encrypted disks? Where is the proof of this?

    No one can’t prove that Telegram use MTProto to encrypt content sent using Cloud Chat, stores them encrypted, and them decrypt them upon opening because the source code for MTProto is closed. So how can you prove that what you’re saying is the way they use?

    Don’t get me wrong in any of this discussion. I don’t trust Telegram anymore. I don’t trust any closed sourced softwares anymore! But one can’t say “it is like this, not like that” without any proof.



  • airikr@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhat's with Telegram? Heard mixed opinions on it.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    False. If you want to tell how things works, get your facts right!

    All data sent to Telegram’s servers will be encrypted once they reach the servers. With other words, the messages and media and other files, will be sent in “plain text” over HTTPS only when using Cloud Chat. In Secret Chat, MTProto is (based on how E2EE works) as safe as what Signal Protocol is.

    But nothing will be stored in plain text, no matter what you use (Cloud Chat or Secret Chat).

    But(!) since the source code for MTProto is closed, we don’t know how it really works, and if we can trust their FAQ or not.

    I trusted Telegram at first, but I don’t trust it 100% anymore (still better than SMS). Am using my own Snikket server these days. Much safer with a lot of 😌😊😍😃 moments, even today, maybe a year later. Especially with OMEMO (Signal Protocol).








  • airikr@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhy Signal over Jabber/XMPP?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah. Let say Signal goes down because of Big Tech and lets say that 50% of their users use Signal as their only messaging app. What will happen then? Hysteria!

    No, XMPP all the way for me until Signal becomes decentralized with zero external connections and when they also have removed the phone number requirement.


  • airikr@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhy Signal over Jabber/XMPP?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I totally agree with you. But!

    But Signal from what I’ve heard really wants us to use their server.

    Signal doesn’t have their own servers. Instead, they rent servers from 4 companies, 3 of them is Google, Amazon, and Microsoft. So Signal is relying on Big Tech and if Big Tech decides that enough is enough, they can easily shut Signal down.

    THAT is what I find most terrifying. And why not use their own server? Not enough money, but they are working on it (good).

    And to make it a little bit worst: Signal depends on a third party company for sending out SMS. Your phone number is therefore handled by not Signal, but by yet another company, highly likey an American company. And they are against privacy invading companies at the same time they are one. Oh, the irony.

    You want sources? Sure.

    Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely love the idea of Signal. But there is flaws that makes Signal more privacy invading than privacy friendly.