By your logic it would be a positive for your code to have errors/warnings. And on the latter, that would appropriate if there was a test that determined if you are free from all known diseases (or at least those that it can detect).
That’s why I said false negative. The medical test is testing for the presence of a disease. So if they find the disease is considered a positive test (it found what it was looking for). For static analysis on code, its the opposite. Its testing if your code is free of issues that it can detect. If it finds no issues, then the test was positive. If does find issues, the test failed and each issue is a negative that contributed to the test failing.
Warnings and errors are negatives not positive. So if it generates a warning that is OK, it’s a false negative.
All of those derivative works are licensed.
Creating a derivative work without a license to do so would be copyright infringement.
Yes but you don’t have a right to create derivative works which by definition is all that AI can spit out.
A. State Legislature writes laws and they are passed when the executive branch (governor) signs them B. State supreme court determines if laws that have been passed are legal (if challenged). They don’t write laws. C. They already had the voters decide in 2020. It passed and the legislature refused to follow through and said “no, we’re not gonna do that”
So what’s going to stop SD from doing the same thing this time?
They (SD) already voted to approve in 2020 but the legislature said “nope, we’re not doing that”.
You can just login at office.com on your mobile browser.
Then things will have to wait until the code is of sufficient quality to be accepted.
My experience is exactly the opposite. I don’t work for a FAANG but I’ve been around the block a bit. Its always the junior devs that try and add new warnings etc to the code base. I always require warnings to be cleaned up even if that means disabling specific instances (but not the whole rule) because the rule is flagging a false negative.
This one kind of reminds of Larry Ellison but looks a bit more human than the real Larry
But why wouldn’t you try and pick up a fare before driving 20 minutes back to the city?
Are you sure that Florida and SD don’t have potential amendments to ban abortion? And we already know how much SD cares about ballot measures. Their constituents voted to legalize pot but their legislature just went “nah, we’re not going to do that”.
It projects future generations if the MAGA wingnuts happen to capture control of their state legislature. They would have to repeal a state constitution amendment which should have a higher bar than passing a law.
We need to vote for “Not Trump” even if its just to ensure that there is a “Not Trump” in future elections.
LOL no. Those decisions were utter bullshit.
You’re better off.
My mom ironed everything that came out of the dryer (and everything that came out of the washer went in the dryer)
You could have gotten his brother Clint for cheaper.