

‘Documentary’ - something that could be consumed in 10% of the time as an article.


‘Documentary’ - something that could be consumed in 10% of the time as an article.


Aren’t EVs mostly a thing to save the car industry, and not really in the end all that good for the environment?
No that’s ICE talking points.
There’s obviously no comparison to be made with public transit, public transit kicks the ass of everything else in environmental friendliness. But it isn’t and won’t be an option in many cities and countries, so cars are here to stay for the medium future at least.
Given that we acknowledge the need for cars, what about the higher environmental impact of manufacturing them? Research shows that based on the cleanliness of the power sources the grid is using, it takes an average of 6 - 24 months for an EV to break even and start overtaking an ICE vehicle in (reduced) emissions. That’s not a long time in a car’s lifetime, and that’s not yet accounting for future economies of scale such as battery recycling that we don’t yet implement.


Even the archived version is paywalled…


We’re not discussing ‘typical’ workloads (whatever that is), we’re discussing one specific person’s use case, and you’ve somehow decided you know better than him without any information

I did! Most of the arguments against basically boil down to ‘make it harder for the average user to do this’. In addition to the unequal access to information, sites like lemvote demonstrate how easy it will be for the average user to bypass the imaginary technical barrier. Sure, you may block it now, but as the Threadiverse grows so will the number of sites and such that do so. Even a browser extension ala RES. Even without the whack-a-mole issue, it’s only a matter of time before somebody sets up such an utility for public access with an obfuscated instance that can’t be easily blocked.

Security via obscurity🙄


It’s definitely news to me that it’s considered a PC game…


Any FPS is playable if you lower your standards enough. But most PC gamers would consider 60 FPS the minimum low bar.
‘Just look for the port that fits the cable!’


Yes, but the ruling stated that they violated defamation rules, which implies defamation did happen.


The question I was asking is, how is it defamation if it’s true. You seem to have wandered off onto a tangent of what constitutes ethical / civilised advertising.
one can easily see what happens when it is allowed to talk about your enemies instead of what you provide. Just look at the logical end of this in form of the attack ads of the US political campaigns.
More countries than not allow comparative advertising, and the world is not ending. Why use politics as an inaccurate example when the majority of countries actually practice it to some extent?


The question was how is it defamation, you’re giving a non-answer that’s nothing more than a blatant appeal to authority.


So if an ad were to make fun of how horrible Tesla’s Full Self Driving feature is, that would be unfair and misleading? As opposed to the pain simple truth?


How is it defamation if it’s true?
How would that test work more than once per student though