Isn’t that exactly what sardonicism is? I would count it as form of humour even if its bitter and full of negativity.

The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.

I like it, its been my main system for the last 2 years. For my use case (software development & some gaming) it works very well.

Fedora Immutable Desktop users when Arch and Debian users fight about whose system is more stable. (I use Fedora Kinoite btw)

Yes, but its not a problem. Usually the mod just bans you from their personal AI dumping ground.

It happens when you post here, you don’t even have to interact with their community. Instead they come here, by their own volition, to be angry about us not liking AI and they then decide to ban every name they come across. This community existing is insult enough for them. Thankfully they self-isolate for the most part.

Looks like Randall has been playing some Poly Bridge.

I think its hilarious that some people seem to actually take this science fiction variation on Pascal’s wager seriously.

Already did that some time ago but I am still in the dataset.

Yes, performance is one reason. Clean architecture uses indirect calls a lot. This doesn’t really matter if you are doing IO bound work like reading files and calling databases, but games do a lot of CPU bound work as well to simulate physics and update game state where all that indirection will waste CPU cycles.

I also can’t really think about a part of a game engine that I would put into the domain layer. The domain layer is the whole reason this architectural pattern exists and if you can’t define that clearly there isn’t a reason to use clean architecture.

Why would the “North American Marlon Brando Look-Alikes” want these wristbands?

The less you read of Uncle Bobs writings the better but Clean Architecture isn’t really his idea(the original was called Ports and Adapters) its just a name that he coined and it unfortunately stuck.

I think Clean Architecture is quite useful for the kinds of long-lived application development projects that you will usually encounter in larger companies. Its main appeal in my opinion is that it prevents your domain logic from becoming entangled with implementation details of the environment in which the software will run. This makes changing out dependencies easier in case you need to switch out some 3rd party services.

Another benefit of using such a well-known architecture in general is that you will have an easier time on-boarding new developers. In a clean architecture project it should be no question where to find, for example, the database context because it will obviously live in the infrastructure layer.

A drawback of this approach is that it can make an application more complex than it needed to be, especially if you are writing a smallish CRUD application that has little to no domain logic.

To me the clean architecture is a good default to start with for monolithic business applications, where requirements might change drastically in the future, but as with anything else it doesn’t fit every use case. So, don’t try to write the next high performance game engine with it.

No, I don’t think that’s it. Judging from your response its more likely that you are being obtuse on purpose.

In every single thread about people not liking AI you are there, being angry about people not liking AI. Whats the point? There are plenty of online communities for AI enjoyers like you. Try Hackernews they glaze AI all day long.

Kinda hilarious how outraged these AI bros get the second someone says no to their worthless slop. How dare they not wanting to be a dumping ground for your LLM extrusions. I always had a low opinion of HN (and Lobsters, which is HN but now in red) but their users really got insufferable in the last few years. Now its just a cesspool of bad takes, anti-intellectualism and unfortunately more and more far-right talking points.

Don’t give him ideas, somebody might actually buy the Charlie Kirk fountain.

Thank you for your service. 50 ₽‎ have been deposited in your bank account. Don’t forget to fill your quota by the end of the day unless you want to volunteer for military service.

Nah, fuck Kagi.

They are literally giving part of your subscription fee to fucking Russia. In comparison, DuckDuckGo have ended their partnership with Yandex. Vlads refusal to follow suit and his steadfast support of Yandex is quite telling to say the least.

Yet another part of your subscription goes to Elon Musks xAI to support Grok in their AI assistant. Even if you are not using that model, all paying users are effectively subsidizing the cost of the Grok API calls. You can’t opt out of that.

If you are into fancy looking cocktails this product makes sense. Making clear ice cubes at home is not easy.

The fascist dog whistle is the word “re-immigration”, it’s just another word for ethnic cleansing.