A software developer and Linux nerd, living in Germany. I’m usually a chill dude but my online persona doesn’t always reflect my true personality. Take what I say with a grain of salt, I usually try to be nice and give good advice, though.

I’m into Free Software, selfhosting, microcontrollers and electronics, freedom, privacy and the usual stuff. And a few select other random things as well.

  • 3 Posts
  • 1.8K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 21st, 2021

help-circle

  • Concerning the IQ: App development and regular programming aren’t that hard. It needs some time and dedication, and willingness to learn how all these things work and tie together, but I think everyone with an average IQ could do it. It’s specific domains where you need a high IQ, like writing advanced signal processing algorithms. Or write very efficient algorithms or do detailed security audits. But App development is just moderately complex, you can get away with basic math… So I’d say it’s doable. Still needs quite some time and effort though. At least several weeks to months. And the Kotlin book I have has like 800 pages filled with information, and that just takes some time to work through. None of it is magic, though. You do one chapter at a time.

    Vibe coding is overrated IMO. There are applications and clients out there for whom it’s fine if you just do a piss-poor job and throw something together, and it somehow works enough. For a lot of things it’s not advanced enough, yet.




  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.detoFuck AI@lemmy.worldI fucking hate AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yeah. I wouldn’t be here, complaining, if there was. Honestly I don’t have a lot of confidence in US politics right now. They’re bothered with different things right now. And the USA aren’t even known to regulate big companies. So… My prediction isn’t great. Maybe the rest of the world can do at least something. But that’s going to be difficult. But we need to continue with this (in my opinion). Even if it’s hard and odds are against us. I still we have some obligation to push for a good future.



  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.detoFuck AI@lemmy.worldI fucking hate AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Hmmh. I mean that’s more a question for the scientists to come up with effective technology. I heard we have some robust watermarking solutions. And with some content types it’s hard to remove and it’ll leave telltale signs if you try to remove it or slap something over it. I’m not an expert though. Nothing is 100%. And I’ve read some questions by people who tried to upload AI voice audiobooks to Spotify. And seems they have some half-way effective system in place. You need some verification from Elevenlabs so no one can steal David Attenborough’s or Scarled Johansson’s voice. And seems that actually works and is almost impossible to circumvent. Even for the people with sufficient criminal energy.

    Ultimately I think it’s two seperate things, coming up with the law, and coming up with effective tech to do it. But things like the Scarlett Johansson voice tells me it’s possible to almost entirely eradicate things from the big platforms, if we force them to do it.

    And we have some other examples like the face-swaps and Emma Watson or other famous people nudes, which really have toned down due to cracking down on it. They’re still there, but we’ve reduced it substancially.

    I don’t think there is a way to achieve 100%. Almost everything can be circumvented somehow if you have enough resources to do it. And we can’t turn back time, so the AI models from today are out there, It’s just not a realistic possibility to reverse their existence. I mean sure we can wish for it. But I think in practice, we need to find ways to deal with what it is… It’s a valid thing to discuss. But if you’re like me and advocate for law to address it… That’s almost always going to be limited to being reactive, to react to the current situation, and ignore things that aren’t realistic.


  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.detoFuck AI@lemmy.worldI fucking hate AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yeah, My reasoning is more, like 80% of the AI companies and services are from the USA. If they passed a law, that’d have you covered for the biggest chunk of it. Plus Europe has similar ideas and the Chinese have already done it. Sure, theoretically we could have companies someplace else, but that’s few and far between. You’d catch most of it and that’s a good start.

    And my other thought process is: People use AI specifically to do things in a low-effort way. Because they don’t want to put in a lot of work. They’re unlikely to be willing to jump through several hoops. That’s why they used AI in the first place. We can catch the majority of them just by adding a small hurdle. And that’s again a large chunk of the AI use cases we can catch. And it all adds up.

    But yes, there are a few people with different motives. They’ll use AI but not because it’s a low effort way to do something, but they have enough energy to buy a graphics card for $1,000, go through the tedious process of removing watermarking (which isn’t easy if done right)… And I don’t have a good solution for those.


  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.detoFuck AI@lemmy.worldI fucking hate AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Well, for a starter you could activate a filter and it’d all vanish from your browser. Pupils couldn’t cheat any more in homework assignments, since the watermarking would immediately flag the homework as generated by AI. And you’d have a clear indication in Apple music or even a button to suppress it. Also some of the fabricated or doctored images would have a label next to them, distinguishing them from real photos, for example in news articles or blog posts that’d be helpful.

    Of course with enough time and effort, some people will be able to circumvent it. But it’ll alleviate some of the pain. And make it way harder for them to pull this off. And cover most of it, since most of it is low effort.


  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.detoFuck AI@lemmy.worldI fucking hate AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think that’s a good example for “Perfect is the enemy of good.” You want to go 100%. I offered a solution that’d get us at least somewhere. But compromising to stay at 0% would be the worst option. I’d still do it, because it’s so easy to do. And then see if we can do more.








  • I’m not sure if that’s going to help you, but I don’t think there is a very effective solution for balding. Obviously you can use paint or filler spray or a wig. My friends who turned bold early on in their 20s either wore a baseball cap or some form of hat. Or they shaved off their hair, and it turned out no hair or just a few millimeters suited them well. But that depends. I believe later on in life you might be able to make peace with it and own it. But probably not in the early twenties. I don’t have much experience with medication or other products. Be a bit careful with what they claim and if they actually do anything.

    I’m not a doctor, that’s just what I’ve seen with the people around me. And I’m not sure what wearing a hat all the time does to the scalp.

    Edit: But maybe you want to visit a doctor and get their advice. If you have other issues as well, these symptoms might be connected.


  • Is SELinux really that important for the average desktop user? I mean we have a lot of concepts like different system user accounts which run services, namespaces…

    And I feel we’d need more sandboxing and a permission system for desktop apps so they have to ask before reading your Documents directory and access the webcam. That’d do way more than SELinux as is… And we kind of have none of that to begin with. (…except software installed as Flatpaks, to some degree.)