This is misinformation. Flatpaks are far less secure than installing from apt. All packages installed from apt are cryptographically signed. This isn’t the case with flatpaks.
Ah, if it’s only available on flatpaks, that’s why few people know about it.
Flatpak is a very insecure method to download software BTW, you probably should avoid it
Edit: It’s curious that I’m getting downvoted for stating a fact. It seems a lot of flatpak users don’t understand security. But that’s kinda the point: even the flatpak developers don’t understand the difference between integrity and authenticity
Flatpak currently does not provide authenticity, and one developer made it clear that he doesn’t understand why that matters in the above ticket that requested signatures of packages back in 2016. It’s been 7 years and still they haven’t fixed this. I don’t think the flatpak team understands or cares about security.
How is this better than zim? Is this in the Debian repos?
Where can I buy it? I want to drink it and walk through grassy fields without worrying.
The deals will allow the coders to serve these significantly lighter sentences than expected in New Zealand rather than being extradited to the United States
Honestly the location is probably more relevant than the time. Nobody wants to go to a US for-profit prison, where torture and rape are commonplace (both by inmates and guards)
Matrix can’t be forced to put backdoors into their software because they are not s company. Signal can.