I’m a critic with actual experience.

Because that’s what you get with a one line prompt. Those which were crafted more with care and intent, you don’t detect with that pattern detector.

AI psychosis is what I accused by precious boss of, when he fabulated about replacing all his employees based on gpt-4o. What we have today is something completely different.

Also, I’m not anthropomorphize these things. Intelligence is not a uniquely human quality.

Our society is very very good at ignoring inconvenient truths. Even when it becomes so obvious it can’t possibly not be seen, we’ll rather invent conspiracies and hunt scapegoats than even acknowledge the actual problem.

I said that a year ago, and half a year ago, too, expecting the S curve to hit and the technology to flatten out at some upper limit. But instead we got the agent loop, and models that make really good use of it, the releases only get faster and faster, and real improvements with each one, either faster and cheaper, but just as good, or actually a good deal more capable. I’m seeing signs of behavior that is more than just a good auto complete, and think there is actual intelligence.

Even should the S curve start to turn towards slowing down now ( and it doesn’t look like it), the ceiling that it’s going towards is so high, I am with Bill Gates here. We are not prepared for what is coming.

He doesn’t take about what is, he talks about what’s coming.

Can the university legally punish attackers without a conviction?

Notepad doesn’t answer and doesn’t agree as eagerly.

The system works as intended by those who set it up.

Thanks for the explanation. I now think the white house was captured by tankies.

Wow, that escalated quickly

deleted by creator

How dare you! Anthropic has it’s own search API, Claude doesn’t need Google ('s API)

Oh yes they do, as a multiplicator of everything that lobbies and billionaires say and do.

Fine, you don’t trust them to keep a contract.

With that mindset you can’t even open a bank account or do any other daily business. Or can you? Why trust those contracts but not Apple or Google’s?

Google is quite specific how they’re using your private data, and Apple as well. You can look into the contract and choose.

Meta has their scandal and has proven untrustworthy. Zuck very first known comments from Facebook success shows how he dismisses his users as idiots. But Google? They were even explicit when they were fine with evil.

And Apple at least has a plausible business concept to not automatically assume they must lie. So, what’s the reason other than “they might lie”, which applies to your bank and doctors as well?

Glad to know it’s seven conditions that Iran wants to be met. The article made the number very clear, and also that Iran is set and firm about this.

Everything else I would expect from a somewhat journalistic medium is missing. For example, what these seven conditions are, in what way they were agreed upon in June, why they are still allegedly not met.

Nothing there, just a very poor repetition of the Iranian position. Not worth the paper it was not printed on, but also not worth a repost.