There are now Bitcoin Ordinals, which are similar to NFTs but with a sufficient size limit to actually store the media itself.
There are now Bitcoin Ordinals, which are similar to NFTs but with a sufficient size limit to actually store the media itself.
If you’re worried about Chinese economy damaging your own, just stop trading with China.
Oh wait, your economy depends on forced cheap labour
But what if I’m doing worse than my old self
Cromite is an alternative
Literally everyone relates to this.
If you believe something as common as this is sufficient to diagnose a mental disorder, you might’ve been misdiagnosed (or your diagnosis was explained insufficiently).
Even if those six were the actual primary and secondary colours, it wouldn’t be necessary to have a primary word for each. You can refer them by hue, or by referring to some object.
But you don’t - that’s why languages lacking these words run into issues as described in the article.
The wheel that you’re implying by those six colours is mostly an artistic “distortion” of the 18th century.
But isn’t there a good reason it was distorted that way?
Of course some colours take up much more or much less of the visible colour spectrum, but that doesn’t mean they have more significance to us.
Like red taking up over five times more of the colour spectrum than yellow doesn’t mean that all these reds need to be named. Most red tones are hardly distinguishable to most people. Yellow and red on the other hand can be distinguished with ease.
You won’t run into the issue of differently coloured traffic lights in english countries; because while the traffic lights might use slightly different shades of green, they don’t use drastically different colours - because we properly named them.
I mean, you really should have words for at least 6 distinct colours, those being red, yellow, blue, green, orange and purple.
Additional words for stuff like brown may be left out, but those six colours should be named.
I do have an idea how “a difficult to kill, unwanted growth” could be put into relation to a war fueled by hatred.
My banking app works flawlessly, even without Google Play services installed.
Here’s a list of banking apps’ compatibility with GrapheneOS. (I don’t know how accurate this list is as a whole, but it’s accurate for my banking app).
I also use a Pixel 6 (for at least a year, probably longer).
For me, the battery, camera, fingerprint and bluetooth work great.
The only issue I also experience is network connectivity sometimes stopping for a few seconds for no apparent reason. (I also dislike that if I enable mobile data, the phone basically completely stops scanning for wifi, and only connects to wifi if I manually connect using the wifi settings.)
(eta: I use GrapheneOS)
In LibreTube, you can go to
Settings > Instance > Disable Piped proxy
I only ever had issues with the piped proxy, not with the app itself.
source?
How does GrapheneOS “lack boldly”?
The linux kernel unfortunately does not follow unix philosophy.
It would be better in various ways if the linux kernel used a micro kernel architecture following the unix philosophy, something Torwalds acknowledged in the past.
Philosophical ideas being lost does not mean they’re outdated.
And that is bad?
Do you see instances who’s main purpose is to represent “people inside the more mainstream American Overton window of mid right to far right” that are even nearly as popular as Hexbear?
If you’re browsing all
you frequently see posts from Hexbear users. I’m yet to come across a noticable amount of posts from users from an instance which represent the group you mentioned.
(I couldn’t even name a single instance that fits that description, because if they exist, they’re not nearly as active as Hexbear.)
Toxic people exist on all public instances. But on some they’re more common than on others.
The issue with Hexbear is that their users tend to talk in a very demeaning and insulting manner. About half of the popular posts on Hexbear are about making fun of people or communities. Their political views are less of an issue; it’s more about their toxic behaviour.
Is this standardized sizing for men’s clothes in the room with us right now?
The point of blockchains is decentralization, and as Lemmy users we know that decentralized services are difficult to make popular, even if they’re an improvement over their competitors.