Friends don’t let their friends buy HP.

  • Player2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I would argue that 2D printing is a lot more complicated than 3D, and it’s not even close

      • refreeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think it is a combination of the required precision, liquid ink vs solid filament and the difficulty of handing paper vs simply moving a print bed on a 3d printer.

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’d argue that this is not an issue from a technical perspective, which would halt open hardware endeavours.

          The precision is mainly a problem regarding the used motors / actuation system, which in turn is “just” a money issue, but the hardware is there. Paper handling is pretty easy.

          I don’t know how complicated it would be to create ink or laser cartridges, but given that there are a lot of 3rd party vendors who offer refill services, I suppose it is manageable.

          My guess for the reason why there is no open hardware 2D printer yet is, because nobody has seriously started such a project yet.

          • derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            There was simply no need, we already have great 2D printers. Like Brother, which doesn’t have DRM, doesn’t need internet, and doesn’t complain about anything ever.

    • mystik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I see this said every time this comes up.

      Are there any efforts starting or even attempting this? Or even taking an existing printer and replacing it’s main board?