• SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Except for the part where they punt to Congress as the sole arbiter of whether Trump engaged in insurrection. They absolutely know Congress won’t get off its collective ass to enforce, because it’s too broken to even pass a budget.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe that someone could sue in federal court, but the 14th amendment doesn’t state that he can’t run for office. It merely states that he can’t hold office. Of course if he wins the election then that will be a giant cluster fuck.

      • qantravon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        If a person cannot hold an office, they are typically also disqualified from running for said office, for exactly that reason. What would you do if an ineligible person won the election? That would be utter chaos.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Someone explained to me there is a procedure for an elected candidate who is ineligible actually wins the election.

          If for any reason the president cannot carry out the duties of the office, it falls to the vice president. So you’d have to just skip the president and swear in his running mate.

          It would still be utterly stupid, but surprisingly there is a process to handle the scenario.