return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 9 months agoDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1975arrow-down120
arrow-up1955arrow-down1external-linkDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·9 months agoThey often just call them elitists, bankers, or “Jews”.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·9 months agoThat’s not supporting evidence.
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·9 months ago“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoNo, it wasn’t. I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoThat only proves that they hate Jews more than blue states. Republicans equating “elite bankers” with Jews, and then you equating that to billionaires, doesn’t actually make them the same thing you know…
They often just call them elitists, bankers, or “Jews”.
That’s not supporting evidence.
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
No, it wasn’t.
I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
That only proves that they hate Jews more than blue states.
Republicans equating “elite bankers” with Jews, and then you equating that to billionaires, doesn’t actually make them the same thing you know…