Trade groups claimed the state law is preempted by former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai’s repeal of net neutrality rules. Pai’s repeal placed ISPs under the more forgiving Title I regulatory framework instead of the common-carrier framework in Title II of the Communications Act. 2nd Circuit judges did not find this argument convincing:

Second, the ABA is not conflict-preempted by the Federal Communications Commission’s 2018 order classifying broadband as an information service. That order stripped the agency of its authority to regulate the rates charged for broadband Internet, and a federal agency cannot exclude states from regulating in an area where the agency itself lacks regulatory authority. Accordingly, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and VACATE the permanent injunction.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Leopards ate my face but even though corporations are people they can not have their faces eaten in quite the same way

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      These shitheads have received massive government handouts to build infrastructure, which they simply pocketed. Nobody’s face has been eaten in the slightest. To this day they are still maliciously suing to prevent municipal internets from providing real competition.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep we shall see god dam if these asshats fought half as hard as they do against poor people for the general public good where would we be

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You thinkk we would be as happy as some of these social democrat countries in Northern Europe these damn republicans seems to like

            • Maeve@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Happier in general, healthier, threat of extinction farther away. The greedy wouldn’t be happier, and it would require a better educated, more vigilant populace without the illusion they too, could some day become part of the leopard class. We’d need better auditing of books, public and private. Fines that were actually punitive, with the certainty of incarceration (more humanely), as well as public record of wrong and correcting measures, and certain nationalization of businesses caught in malfeasance a second time. I think essential goods and services should be nationalized anyway, but that’s an unpopular opinion on my instance.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        From the article isps fought against fcc regulations which subjected them to state regulations, hence leopards ate my face fyi

      • femboy_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Since you’re stupid let me explain, what i believe he’s saying is that even though corporations are a “person” according to the law certain things that can happen to actual persons (like a leopard eating someone’s face) can’t happen to a corporations

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Since you’re stupid let me explain

          That response is awesome.