• NateNate60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not gonna say I agree with this or defend censorship but when your country got invaded by the most famous communist country in history and had a bad time under their rule, then it’s quite understandable why people there don’t like symbols associated with said country.

    The entire affair is just a mess of history. A fascist dictatorship being replaced with a communist one.

    • EuthanatosMurderhobo@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      and had a bad time under their rule

      A fascist dictatorship being replaced with a communist one.

      I’d like to hear more about this alternative history you got rolling around your skull where Finland became communist. I live in the reality where they joined nazis (as Stalin knew they would, which is why he had to move the border away from Leningrad), participated in starving a city to death and threw POWs into death camps, not the other way around. And then they turned around, seeing the writing on the wall, and avoided justice that way.

      And now they’re still nazis.

      • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tbf the siege of Leningrad happened after.

        And just to be clear, in case any historical revisionists are reading this: the Continuation War was not the USSR invading Finland, it was Finland invading the USSR alongside Nazi Germany.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope your realise that people can understand why others think in a certain way without agreeing with that way of thinking. You seem to think that because I said that I can understand why Finnish people might not like the hammer and sickle, I must therefore support banning it. I don’t.

        • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t matter what you intended to do. You ended up defending Finland’s decision. People are not going to pour over your background and study your life in details to say “NateNate60 is a swell guy”. They’re going to read your previous comment and say yeah, you defended Finland banning communist symbols because they allied with the nazis 80 years ago and are still salty about getting their ass handed to them when they joined in the siege of Leningrad.

            • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              One of the many curiosities of the world along with the bearded lady (she has a hormonal imbalance) and Houdini’s daring escapes.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look who was constantly working for the independence of Finland from the Russian Empire (bolsheviks), look who actually did helped and allowed Finland to become independent (bolsheviks), look what happened in Finland after independence (revolution was drowned in blood by protofascists), look who supported white army general Yudenich invasion of RSFSR (Finland plus Estonia and UK), look who supported head white general Kolchak even though Kolchak explicitly denied Finland independence (Finnish “hero” Mannerheim).

      Finnish counterrevolutionary romance, or more actually marriage with fascism didn’t started in 1940, it started in 1917 by attacking communists with the help of every protofash possible.