• dmention7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Europeans literally see no irony in throwing shade at Americans for hanging onto their traditional measurement system, while also speaking 27 different languages in the span of a few hundred miles.

    Maybe come down off your high horse until you get that situation sorted, eh? >.>

    • gentooer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Whenever I post something on the internet, I do so in English, since that’s a language most people on this world speak. I’d love it if Americans did the same with measurements when writing down recipes on the internet. I’m sorry for this offensive opinion.

      Als ge liever wilt, kan ik het ook in het Nederlands doen. Op het internet spreek ik over het algemeen Engels, aangezien dat een taal is die nagenoeg iedereen spreekt. Ik zou het vree tof vinden als Amerikanen dat ook zouden doen met maten en gewichten in hun recepten. Sorry om zo kort van antwoord te zijn.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Last panel should be the entire US Customary System, which is literally just a rescaling of the SI (“metric” system) units. US Customary is derived directly from SI.

  • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What are you talking about with the weed? It’s sold in pounds, ounces, quarter ounces and “half quarters” which is as ridiculously un-metric as it gets.

  • Arve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t forget the most important US measurements of them all: 5.56, 7.62, 9, etc.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s not forget that the Apollo space program used SI units at every step, except for displaying it to the astronauts.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      And that a very expensive probe crashed into mars instead of landing because NASA used metric for all measurements but one contractor didn’t get the memo.

    • Laura@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      NASA is also really funny and uses millimeters as their base unit for everything.

  • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Also, the imperial system is defined through the metric system.

    In using imperial, you’re just using metric with extra steps.

  • woodenskewer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I got 40-90 C down pretty well monitoring my PC temps in that I know more of what it should read in C compared to F.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    When I was young I lived in Puerto Rico for a few years (1980’s). Milk was sold in either one litre cartons or one gallon jugs. Distances in road signs and road markers were in kilometers but speed was in miles per hour. Fuel was sold in litres but fuel usage is in miles per gallon.

    • BOMBS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Seems like a good way to become proficient in both so that you’re more adaptable.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Nah. People just talked distances in fuel tank fractions, fuel dollars or travel time. For example, “how far is the mall?”, ‘about a quarter tank’. Or “how far is San Juan?”, ‘$5 will get you there’. Or " how far is Rio Grande" ’ about ten minutes that way’.

  • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    not to mention, the imperial system is just the metric system in disguise. An inch is defined as 25.4mm, and not by some universal constant, like a proper measuring system.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yeah, but you still have work tool measurements in 5/8, 7/32, and 13/64 or whatever the fuck dumbass measurements.

    I say this as an American that hates the way tools use measurments here.

      • skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Mechanics work in metric mostly. You still come across some imperial sizes occasionally. Though recently that’s been getting standardized a lot better.

          • skulblaka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I mean, that might be true, but I work on a lot of shit that’s right around 20 years old. It’s mostly metric. But I keep a set of standard sockets around that I’ve had to pull out once or twice. Sometimes it’s been because of swollen bolts but sometimes I’m pretty damn sure that’s a 5/16.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I can guarantee it’s either someone that put the wrong bolt there or it’s due to rust.

              All American cars have been fully metric since the 90s (with a push during the Carter years as well), Japanese cars since the 60s… Maybe you’ve had to work on a x.5mm bolt but that’s extremely rare.

          • Kanda@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then there’s planes, and trains and also ships. Ships can have parts and systems from god knows when

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I specifically prefer woodworking in fractional inches. I’ve had this argument on Lemmy before and it basically goes:

      “But inches bad! Metric good! Fractions bad! Powers of ten good!”

      “I mean yeah okay but I nearly never have to divide by ten in the wood shop, I do have to divide by two or three or four, and since we mill stock to finished dimensions that are usually 3/2*x inches, most commonly 3/4” or 3/2" it’s trivial to do. Cutting mortise one third the board’s width in 3/4" stock ends up being exactly 1/4" wide. Easy. The metric world usually mills boards to 19mm, which is pretty close to 3/4" so it’s suitable for the same applications. Show me the line on a metric tape measure that indicates one third of 19mm."

      “But Americans use inches so it must be dumb and bad!”

      I use metric for quite a lot of things, I learned chemistry and physics in metric in school, I vastly prefer doing mechanical and engineering things in metric. I learned carpentry (structure building) in inches but I could cope with metric there, I learned how to fly in mostly US customary units (distances in nautical miles, speeds in nautical miles per hour aka knots, altitude and runway lengths in feet, pressures in PSI, temperature in °C) I could cope with different units there. I’m not giving up inches in the furniture shop though, because working in fractions works to well.

      But yeah the faster we can erase fractional inch wrenches from the world the better. “What’s one size louder than 3/4?” “Ah shit 6/8…12/16, plus 1…13/16.”

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Except there’s an easy way to mark thirds: if you have a, let’s say, 27 cm wide board you take the measuring by skewing a little the tape and measuring 30 cm. You mark 10 cm and 20 cm and there you have it: a third of the wide. You don’t even need the precise measure. If you have something with proportional marks you just use it and you get a third no matter the width. It’s like a center finder but with thirds (or fourths or…)

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That will likely work for the length or width of boards, but what about thickness? Mark out a mortise and tenon on a 19mm thick board with that technique and tell me how it goes.

          This is the kind of shit I’m talking about. You see these kinds of “Nuh uh, it’s not a problem, you just learn all these hacky workarounds” excuses out of the inch-ounce crowd, where you “just have different measuring cups for that” or “our butter packaging has tablespoon markings on it” but in the wood shop it’s the other way around because the physical tasks are inherently easier to express as fractions rather than decimals, so I’m the one saying “I just measure it with my tape measure or combo square or ruler and it’s right.” and the metric crowd keep going “Nuh uh, it’s not a problem, you just learn all these hacky workarounds.”

              • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                2" / 3 = 0.666666666 Show me that point in you tape measure 😜

                And both cases can be fixed by just skewing a little the tape (19 mm -> 21 mm and 2" -> 2.1". Close to 20°)

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Some of us are comfortable going both ways.

    But don’t tell anybody because I live in Texas.