• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you dont 100% agree with every action of Israel’s government, then you’re their enemy.

    It’s a common thing with far right religious extremists.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The instant someone makes that accusation, I disengage. I’ve learned the hard way.

        People think that calling someone antisemitic (or anti-Muslim) is a great debate tactic if you’re trying to put your opponent on the defensive and derail the conversation. There’s a major difference between criticizing a government/organization and general bigotry, and they know that perfectly well, but people who want an easy, emotional argument don’t care. They’re not interested in details.

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not interested in details.

          Same goes for most critics of Israel. They don’t want to listen because they don’t care. They already have their made up facts to parrot, even if they know little of actual history of the region.

          • magnetosphere@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. The argument I made applies in reverse, too. Trying to hide racism by calling it “political discourse” is bullshit.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would love to see the US abandon Israel and let them pay for their own military/genocidal operations, but I know that’s unpossible in the current political climate.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only impossible if you stay silent. Call your congress people. Tell them how you feel about it. Make a case for pushing peace and not giving militar aid.

        (Imo all aid should be in the form of supporting peace talks or protecting civilians, but I don’t know what the second part would look like.)

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have reached out to my congresscritters, but I’m in a gerrymandered area and mainly have trump nuts gargling toadies that would rather let the country burn than dare let people they don’t agree with have a voice.

          That’s why I say it’s unpossible, because I don’t have the dosh to influence the idiots into not being war mongering fucksticks that actually care about anyone brown or without money.

          That’s not to say I’m not still trying, I just can see I’m pissing into the wind.

          • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If it’s somehow any consolation, I’m in a place where it’s the opposite and I could vote for anything and the democrats would win regardless, and whenever I try to push my representatives on issues that don’t align with where the party already is, I get what is essentially an automated response.

            How funny, after writing the above I searched my reps name in my inbox to go through some past ones, and the last one where I wasn’t just urging them to follow through on trump was the Israel Palestine conflict centered around Sheikh Jarrah in 2021. I asked him to make it matter in the next budget. All I got was a semi pre-written response where my senator said he supported asking for a ceasefire. Maybe I’m the moron for asking my senator to stand up and ask the rest of congress to give Israel less money instead of just asking for them to stop shooting. Everyone’s asking them to stop shooting, not everyone has real power to change the conditions that allows the shootings, I thought that was the point of appealing to the government.

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israel is the US’ key military foothold in the region, that’s the deal and that’s going to prevent anything more than a light rebuke.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you might be right, but the reality is yanking US support is an existential crisis for Israel.

            we have more leverage in that game.

  • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking children with nuclear briefcases, terrifying. Guterres’s speech was very, very balanced.

  • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re not on the side of Israel and USA you’re on the side of Hamas, Russia, Iran, NK and China. Which is unsurprising given UN’s record.

    • sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what about the stance of not supporting Israel’s genocide of Palestinians while condemning Hamas actions. Ever consider that its possible to be against both sides?

    • modegrau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a game of sportsball. You can be on the side of people getting murdered who have no direct control of the decisions of the governments and organisations committing atrocities.

      That’s the UN’s job in fact. They aren’t picking a side, and they are saying both sides have done wrong. All that’s happened is the UN acknowledging an objective fact, if you consider killing civilians and targeting civilian infrastructure to be wrong.