• tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I went from 3 to 2, as I went from 2x24@1080p + 1x34@1440p to 2x32@4k. I the jump to 4k with such large screens meant I have a massive more amount of usable screen real estate especially as I do not use any scaling on the screens, although I do marginally increase the font size. I can manage six windows per screen all neatly tiled as long as its not my IDE, that I need a good 2/3rd of the screen to actually be useful for me.

    It would be unmanageable if I tried to do this without a proper tiling window manager though, I use Sway. I particularly like how the virtual desktops work on Sway as I have separate virtual desktops per screen, makes them actually useful for me. Typically I have two per screen, IDE/Terminal and Discord/Signal/Music, Multiple Browser windows and Email/Teams/Office.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a portable monitor just in case and I bust it out if there’s no monitor for me to plug in.

  • bitchkat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I ended up buying a portable 15" monitor so that when I’m forced to work on laptop, I have the option to use dual display. Basically the same size as a large tablet.

  • Pirtatogna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a nice widescreen monitor standing unused at my desk and I work sitting cross legged in my armchair with a laptop on my lap.

  • joneskind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I must be lucky because I have a laptop + 2 24" 4K monitors setup and it turns out it is too much for me. Now I just use my laptop in clamshell mode with one horizontal monitor in landscape and the other portrait, but I wonder if won’t sell one those and keep the vertical one aside my open laptop.

      • joneskind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        TBH I didn’t invent it. I think it’s the way Apple refers to a closed Mac laptop since the clamshell iBook. And since I’m not a native English speaker I usually find the expression easier to use.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “I need multiple monitors to see all my content!” -> dead giveaway you’ve never used a window manager with virtual desktops or window grouping.

    Or that you’re a streamer.

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      None of those things help you see more stuff at one time… I’ll take physical screen real-estate over virtual screen real-estate any day of the week.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I recently downsized from 2 to 1. NGL, I miss the second in some circumstances, but I also don’t miss the inclination to have YouTube or Netflix constantly open if I’m not using the second for anything else.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Imagine me working on a 6.8" phone and a bluetooth keyboard…

    It’s enough for writing documentation, and for a while I was top notch at writing my docs at my underpaid job, but then I went through multiple burnout, while my sleep progressively got worse.

    Hopefully they won’t extend my contract after November, so I can finally sleep when I want, and not when people that feed their chickens at 5:00AM do.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This was never not the case for me.

    In CRT era there was just no contest, the resolution (the amount of data displayed) alone was worlds apart. Yet I only ever had one CRT connected at a time.

    Once the LCDs became minimally viable for me I just never disconnected the previous LCD when upgrading/buying another one (I’ve always been a “main screen + support screens” sort of operator).

    Finally LCDs and OLEDs became just too big (and tiling much much better) to have “too many” monitors.
    Yet there are times when I wish I had a mini monitor (one of those candy bar screens where I would just have Signal or something, about 480×1920 pixels, they are cheap but I then remember how silly the need is and don’t want to further consumerism for needles thighs).

    • b0gl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was using dual monitors back before LCDs became the norm. I always had a splitting headache from looking at the screens. It went away with LCDs.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I remember when one crt was like 800x600 and another 1280x1024. Worlds apart.

      Another time, another battle.

  • mikyopii@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t know if I would want to do it all the time, but I have come to appreciate the workflow when using a single monitor. I feel like I’m more focused.

    • nikita@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ikr. Though it’s largely dependent on the kind of work you’re doing, I find that for myself a 1 monitor setup is sufficient.

      I feel like I was moving documents around too much when I had multiple. Or that it would make me lazy cause I didn’t bother closing something I was finished with.

      That being said — widescreens are wear it’s at.