• Tiresia@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A brief history of regulation…

    • Euclidean zoning
    • Alcohol prohibition
    • Subsidies for fossil fuel companies
    • 2008 financial crisis bailouts

    A brief history of self-regulation…

    • Decriminalization of drug possession and consumption
    • Nunavut self-governance
    • Cash donation charities; UBI
    • EU Schengen agreement

    Maybe: poor people self-regulating > governments regulating > corporations self-regulating > rich people self-regulating?

    • taanegl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      …wat? I can’t hear you over the industrial cherry picking you’re doing over there.

      • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If you prefer to eat the entire cherry tree, that’s your perogative. Personally I prefer using more precise tools so I only take what I need to and do as little damage as possible, though rest assured the cherries are hand-picked. The noise must be on your end.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Euclidean zoning

      Houstonian here, and developers will do that regardless of the presence or absence of zoning laws. Its just a cheaper way of mass producing suburban real estate.

      Alcohol prohibition

      Originally came out of a period of wholly unregulated alcohol production, resulting in enormous social harm both through direct consumption (moonshine poisoning people, quack medics distributing alcohol as a panacea, alcoholism ruining lives) and knock-on effects (domestic violence, workplace injuries, automotive fatalities). The post-21st amendment wasn’t a return to laisse-faire alcohol production, but of strict regulatory enforcement of production, distribution, and consumption under a litany of state laws.

      Subsidies for fossil fuel companies

      Energy is a utility and should have always been in the domain of the public sector, both because it is essential for domestic commerce and vital for national security. The biggest subsidies that fossil fuel companies receive come from the MIC, which is the largest single consumer of fuel and also the means by which the country secures access to oil fields.

      And under state leadership, we’ve seen a consistent and reliable pivot to nuclear power as the preferred method of energy production. The US, France, and the UK were all heavily invested in emerging nuclear technologies during the 60s, 70s, and 80s, as they sought to compete with the Eastern Block, India, and China. The fall of the USSR, the pivot to full privatization of the energy sector under Reagan and Clinton, and the ascendancy of US-friendly Middle Eastern dictatorships in the global financial system are what continue to force our reliance on fossil fuels.

      Had we continued to treat energy as a utility rather than a profit center, we’d have kept a great deal of fossil fuel in the ground and pivoted to full nuclear electrification 40 years ago.

      2008 financial crisis bailouts

      Graham Leech Biley created the conditions for financial collapse, not the post-collapse short-term takeover of the banks. The biggest mistake Obama made was de-nationalization. A better president would have extended the bailouts directly to homeowners and permanently nationalized the home mortgage system.