• papertowels@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Go do some research before claiming such things. It has been a thing for many many years.

    So that’s the thing… The bans have also worked this way for that long, which further solidifies the idea that valve prioritizes banning hackers over being forgiving of cheating relatives…

    Most people getting VAC bans are the stupid ones trying out free hacks.

    Are the ones using free hacks not hackers? Seems like bans on them for hacking makes sense.

    You keep asking for my solution, but my solutions are so obvious it would take a stupid person to not think of them. Hey here’s one: “investigate the main accounts manually”. I thought such ideas would not require a triple digit IQ to be considered obvious.

    I’m going to propose that this would probably take an infeasible number of hours when you scale it up to the full customer base for steam, which looks like 132 million monthly active users.. Otherwise, like you said, it’s so obvious, what else would prevent them from thinking of it and implementing it?

    They already had family sharing where a ban upon the main account could have been contested. You could at least ask them to consider the age or stupidity of the person or family member using your library.

    Hmm, I might be misunderstanding what you’re saying, but it doesn’t seem like the case. If a borrower got the main account banned, it was up to the borrower to successfully appeal.

    EDIT: here’s a proposed change that I like. It’s better than a blanket “you get 1 excused VAC ban”, because with that solution what happens when you have two unruly teenagers? n+1, children, for that matter. However this would still potentially double the amount of hackers, since they could get their first strike for free before truly losing access to the game, so it really falls to how much steam wants to weigh keeping hackers out of games vs allowing folks to share libraries.

    • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t understand your point. Nor do I even understand why you want to justify this.

      I only see selfishness because you obviously get butthurt over hackers.

      Besides that I see no empathy for kids and teenagers, and even less for their parents.

      This is done and you are blocked.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I only see selfishness because you obviously get butthurt over hackers.

        You’re projecting a lot of the preferences and priorities onto me when I’ve shown that steam has chosen to operate this way for nearly a decade. It’s not what I want - it’s what steam wants.

        Steams job is to provide people with a good gaming experience, my guess is that hackers ruin that for others so they don’t like it and prioritize banning hackers.