It begins…

Found out via this post

Interesting side-note, reddit’s anti-VPN policies and blocking some archivers like ghostarchive.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    OTOH, if they’re low-usage, why remove them? Do they spend too much bandwidth, CPU, whatever??

    It’s generally desirable to remove old code and features to make the code neater. It’s also possible that some bug happened because of those features.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s usually better to not touch code that is working, it won’t become “clean” just because you deactivate some stuff and if you do try to actually remove code (to “clean” things, whatever that means in a setting bigger than a small project), good luck not breaking anything.

      Source: oldtimer software dev

      • pingveno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Code that exists still needs to be updated and maintained. It interacts with the rest of the code. Sure you can leave it lying around, but at a certain point the technical debt is going to catch up to you.