• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    “vigilante justice is bad” and “no one has the right to decide who lives and who dies” mfs the second vigilante justice happens:

    ITT: “vigilante justice is bad and i can no way condone it” wink

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      It is bad. We have a society of laws and justice that’s supposed to prevent the need for vigilantism. That system has broken down and favors people of wealth, and thus you have a return of vigilantes being seen as heroes.

    • L/nerd@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      vigilante justice is bad because you are enforcing a personal rule of law. the uhc ceo was enforcing many of his own rules through the company’s own treatment of claims and its effects on governing entities. there was no justice, simply a warning that noone is less mortal than the people they commodify.