President-elect Donald Trump on Friday confirmed that Republicans will work together to ditch Daylight Saving Time, the practice of changing the clocks by an hour twice a year.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    Trump says lots of things.

    Who knows which he will actually try to do?

    Or how many of those things he will actually succeed at?

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    So states he can’t fix greedflation and moves to checks notes …eliminating daylight savings. Pretty fuckin low on the list…

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Some people want DST all year and others want Standard, because depending on where in the country you live–the latitude you are at, and whether you live at the east or west edge of your time zone makes a big difference in your experience of them.

    One solution is to adjust the time zone boundaries to make the timing work out better for different locations: making the lines a bit more diagonal will help, and/or add another zone so each zone is narrower and there’s not as much difference in sunrise/sunset times from one edge to the other.

    Another idea is, don’t choose between DST and Standard, choose halfway between them: at the next time change, change it by only 1/2 hour instead of a full hour, and leave it there. This may sound strange but there are other countries whose times are offset by 1/2 hour from the others, so it’s not that unusual. So you’re halfway between DST and Standard all year round, so it’s not a big difference and is a good compromise.

    Of course it’s always too dark in winter, but combine both of the above mitigations and you minimize any problems from leaving clocks the same all year, no matter what part of the country you live in.

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Settling at half increments isn’t a bad idea in theory but it will be hell for international business because the average person is a moron.

      If you’re going to go this radical just abolish time zones and use UTC. Then locally decide what time is the start of standard business and what is not.

        • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Excluding India, the GDP of those times zones is pretty damn small no? There’s not a massive amount of international trade and business, meaning fewer morons to fuck the time difference up.

          I’m fully stating that the average person is functionally idiotic as it is, based on the meeting times I’ve been booked.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      A few states can move a time zone, but northern states really benefit from the change. Daylight varies a ton seasonally in the north compared to south, Panama City has about 10-14 hours, but Seattle has about 8.5-16 hours

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m fine with that, but I think we should settle on Daylight Savings time. You know, when time is an hour ahead of what it is now.

      • airportline@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        If we had year-round DST, the sun wouldn’t rise until after 8 AM in the winter.

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I wake up at 6:45-7 most days and it’s not like it’s bright then either. I would MUCH prefer an hour more of daylight after I get off work

            • iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              If DST wasn’t a thing, it would still not get dark in the summer time until after 9PM for me. I’d rather stay on permanent DST because winter is absolutely miserable when it’s dark until mid-late morning, dreary, rainy, and overcast all “day”, and then dark again by mid-afternoon.

            • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              I ink it really depends, to be honest.

              I know I get a bit grim with winter reducing activities. What is impossible to tease out is just how much of this is weather changing with time zone.

              I ink what matters most is the population centres and how they’re affected - my thinking is if most of the population is grouped in places that benefit from being ‘more livable’ because they’re not as dark and damp through ones daily experiences, then it’d be worth keeping.

              I live in NZ and think itd be great here, but we’re quite far from the equator, so get a lot of dawn and dusk (I feel like it would have a big affect here, and in my perspective, it would be broadly positive for _most folks _). It’s shocking how much of an improvement DST makes in just the basic liveability - by the weather has generally been subtly improving for a few weeks as well, which completely waters down my argument

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fingers crossed that this gives us an extra hour of sunshine after work instead of before. It’s so depressing to leave the office at 4pm and it’s already dark out.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      No.

      You make be spring forward and I’m owed my motherfucking fall back. I’ll take up arms to defend that stance.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Fall back is nice but we should just change the time whimsically instead.

        What if instead of one hour in the fall you randomly got 8?

        You could technically get 582 hours of overtime in one shift in some states depending on the change.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        One link to a research article from 1974 about fuel usage. One link to an article about the change between time offset being a problem. No substantiation for other claims. This article is practically an editorial.

      • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Eliminating vaccines is also bad for public health. Let’s not fool ourselves into thinking this is a component of the decision.

        That said, I’m also sus of that position. There are plenty of healthy societies that live much further north of the us population centers.

  • Verat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I support standard time more, the 12 o clock at the center of the timezone should be noon, not having noon at 1PM, and day lengths are better on average without. DST makes it better, but only for sunset times, it makes the mornings drastically worse and I think employers and schools should just change their hours if they care so much about sunlight when they leave.

    • Heydo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I support daylight savings time more and all of those regions where the sun doesn’t rise before 7AM can switch time zones.

      For example, all of the USA switches to permanent daylight savings time, and the western portion of Texas that sees 0 days with a sunrise before 7 AM switches to the Mountain time zone. Now they will experience sunrise before 7 AM much more often.

      • Verat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Eh, I support places moving time zone but a bigger factor for me is also linguistic, it doesnt make sense for high noon at the place the time zone is defined at to be at 1 in the afternoon, the one thing I think alot of people can agree with is that 12 should be noon or as close as possible and I feel that DST works against this.