• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dude that’s now how any trial works. You cannot prove an accident is an accident. It’s the prosecutors job to prove that it wasn’t.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Proving it was not intentional, and proving it was an accident, are two very different things.

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          In this context, we’re talking an about Luigi murdering a CEO. You can’t change reality in order to make your analogy work.

          He murdered a CEO. If it were with a gun, or a car- the outcome would be the same. Which is my point, and has been this entire time.

          I’m staying within the wheelhouse of the topic. OP stated that it would be different if he used a car and I’m here to explain how it would not be different. A car in this car would be co suffered a weapon in a murder.