Why’d they changed it I can’t say

It’s significantly worse if your house is humid, and dehumidifiers increase the heat, but they’re still worth it

Fun fact: the reason air conditioners are called “conditioners” instead of “coolers” is that they were originally designed for dehumidification.

WARNING: NOT FOR USE IN HIGH HUMIDTY.

Adding more water to an already hot and humid situation risks a Wet Bulb.

If the water coming out of your cold tap is cool (which it should be, since pipes are typically underground), then I think maybe it would still work because you could refresh the t-shirt with colder water occasionally. It’s just less than ideal compared to doing it in a dry climate.

Trump did more than that; he advocated for simply seizing guns without due process. He’s worse than Biden from a second amendment perspective, not equal!

Why the fuck would a hardcore second amendment voter ever consider supporting Donald “take the guns first” Trump, though‽

If it were “obviously the case,” the guy that commented about still being confused wouldn’t have 7 upvotes (at the time of writing).

When Kai Winn is a more ruthless capitalist than Quark

Is the woman who was arrested the same person as the officer in the video, or a third party who is being punished solely for the act of publishing it? The article doesn’t fucking say!

Yet again, failure to enforce antitrust law is a big part of the problem.

deleted by creator

You know, everyone hates that guy, but he was the only reasonable person in that movie.

Much like the EPA!

They built back-pack carried laser weapons capable of annihilating a city block with an errant crossing of the streams.

Those were “unlicensed nuclear accelerators” – way worse than mere lasers.

Yes, it’s true: since the ruling, the EPA has no dick.

“Unknowingly” – maybe for a few of the idiots in the back, but not the party leadership. I mean, they have international conferences right out in the open (let alone more secretive cabals) where they collude to advance their fascist agenda worldwide. Don’t tell me you’re still surprised by now that even their railing against the “(((globalist))) new world order” was yet more projection, LOL.

I hate that they decided to have Morpheus hold up a battery instead of a processor because some empty suit thought audiences were too stupid to get it.

• NO, NO₂ (or collectively, NO_x) - air pollutants

• N₂O - anaesthetic

Just in case anyone was wondering about the specific minutiae this ruling requires non-subject-matter-expert judges to take on.

Her background is as a “tough on crime” (read: shitty on civil rights) prosecuting attorney.

You’d think the Feds would step in to fix that sort of Establishment Clause violation, no matter how powerful the cultists are at the NYC (or Clearwater, or Salt Lake City, or…) local government level, but I guess not.

Sounds like a job for antitrust law.

What’s relevant is that the commenter I replied to suggested that it’s Spotify’s “prerogative” whether to comply with the law or not. It isn’t.

This issue here is people spouting dangerous late-stage-capitalist nonsense, not the content of the ADA rule. Your demand is actually just a derailment tactic.

I never said it was. I said that the requirement is the same whether it’s a free account or a paid one. It’s either always required or it’s never required, but it sure as Hell is not “their prerogative” based on how much they get paid.

Think about it for a second: what the parent commenter is suggesting is that it’s somehow okay for a company to use compliance with legal requirements as an upselling opportunity! You do see the problem with that line of thinking, right?!