This is a weird one. Bear with me. From !dataisbeautiful@lemmygrad.ml:

So I said to myself, “that’s a little bit weird. The US one going up, I can actually believe, but the North Korea one being lower is definitely wrong.”

I think Our World In Data is just being shoddy, as they often do.

https://www.wfp.org/countries/democratic-peoples-republic-korea

https://www.statista.com/statistics/269924/countries-most-affected-by-hunger-in-the-world-according-to-world-hunger-index/

The thing I found funny, and why I’m posting here, comes from observing why it was that they started their graph at 2003 and exactly at 2003.

I feel like you could use this as a slide in a little seminar in “how to curate your data until it matches your conclusion, instead of the other way around.”

And also, I don’t think the hunger rate suddenly dropped from epic to 0 exactly in 2003, I think more likely Our World in Data is just a little bit shoddy about their data.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    This article talks about the global famine relief effort for North Korea in 2002 that included monitoring so food actually went to people.

    https://asiasociety.org/famine-north-korea

    So yes, I believe it could have gone from epic to 0 in one year because most of the developed world came together and shipped food to North Korea.

    And it’s still shameful that it’s increasing in the US.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        The propaganda is that they asked for food, the developed world sent it with monitors to ensure it went to people and then they said it helped?