Even though the Sovcit was carrying a writ of mandamus to buy butter, the Sovcit bought margarine which was not covered by the writ. Classic rookie mistake. /s
“Sir, this is a Publix. We don’t accept ‘negotiable instruments’ in payment for groceries, only cash or card. You have put down a quarter, which is indeed cash, but you keep referring to it as ‘0.1808 troy ounces of silver’.”
Aight, the judge should take his car because he was using it to commit commerce with Publix to buy butter!
Even though the Sovcit was carrying a writ of mandamus to buy butter, the Sovcit bought margarine which was not covered by the writ. Classic rookie mistake. /s
Imagine the paperwork they’d submit for an exchange instead of a receipt
“Sir, this is a Publix. We don’t accept ‘negotiable instruments’ in payment for groceries, only cash or card. You have put down a quarter, which is indeed cash, but you keep referring to it as ‘0.1808 troy ounces of silver’.”
I Can’t Believe It’s Not Sui Juris
I can’t believe it’s not mandamus.