• batmaniam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Didn’t say they did. People die none the less. If that’s acceptable that’s fine, but call it what it is: An acceptable loss.

      • batmaniam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t disagree, it doesn’t change that you need to own the bodies as an acceptable loss.

              • batmaniam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I’m done with this, but no, there was not. I respect and acknowledge anyone choosing a protest, I really do. I’m a registered libertarian for gods sakes. There we two choices, one was going to win, the other wasn’t. If the reason someone allowed people to die was because less people would die in the future so be it, when it came down to it, that was the only choice on the table. Would have loved if it was different, but it wasn’t. You don’t get to avoid the splatter.

                  • batmaniam@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    Endangered by my vote? I don’t like the splatter I’m getting. In fact I hate it, but I do own it. I tried to get less of it to wipe off.