• photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh. I thought since his third wouldn’t be consecutive with his first two, it’d be legal. I guess it depends on how they define consecutive.

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t include future possibilities in requirements to get to that future possibility.

      “Hasn’t already served two consecutive terms” doesn’t care if the third would be non-consecutive.