• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If I had to guess it’d be the ability for oxygen to diffuse through the shell and reach the embryo?

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I got curious and your assumption is correct for one of the limiting factors.

        Here is what I found:

        • The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
        • As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
        • The distance from the shell to the center increases.
        • Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
        • Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
        • Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.
        • Max@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I think point two may be wrong. The strength of a shell should be proportional to its thickness, which would scale linearly with its size (assuming the shell got thicker in proportion to the size). There’s definitely a point where a self supporting egg requires very thick shells like you said, but the scaling law you gave uses the wrong change.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Here is what I found:

      • The shell must be strong enough to support the egg’s weight and protect the embryo, but thin enough for the chick to break through when hatching.
      • As size increases, the weight grows cubically (volume), but shell strength only increases quadratically (surface area), so there’s a point where the shell would have to be too thick to hatch from.
      • The distance from the shell to the center increases.
      • Oxygen diffusion becomes inefficient, and the embryo could suffocate.
      • Larger eggs are harder to keep at a uniform temperature.
      • Birds incubating the eggs would need to generate and distribute more heat, which is physically demanding.
        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          I am not an eggspert but after a quick search it seems many bird eggs are green in colour due to a pigment called biliverdin.

          Interestingly verde is green in Spanish.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            A lot of biological and other scientific terms are actually Latin or some mix of it. Bili means “Bile”. Sources say “verd” in this case comes from French verd an old way to say green (Modern: vert/verte), but in any case the French words still derive from Latin viridis.

            Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, Catalan, and a few other minor languages are all descendants of Latin collectively called the Romance Languages. Speakers of one can often understand a lot of any other of the languages or Latin. Not completely mind you, but enough to get some meaning. Spanish speakers can understand a lot of written Portuguese (but not so much spoken due to pronunciation differences), Italian and Spanish speakers can almost have a conversation spoken or written. Portuguese/Italian/Spanish speakers will have a harder time with French though, they will recognize many written words but not enough to really call it totally understandable, and almost nothing spoken. Etc, etc.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Last 3 points millions of years ago the planet was much warmer with a lot more oxygen so for dinosaurs they would be moot.